this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
243 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3566 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 hours ago

You have one party led by a Nazi, you have a Nazi party.

If you have one party led by a Nazi, and the other party invites and allows "peaceful" talks, you have two Nazi parties.

Trump is a Nazi, acting like you're just doing your job of transition of power means you're handing the keys to the Nazis.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats: "we are the only thing standing against fascism"

Reality: *democrats standing with fascism*

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Pushes glasses Well, actually, they're sitting. Nay, maybe even laying??? IN BED?!? HOLDING HANDS!!! >:0 /s

[–] Kissaki@lemm.ee 4 points 5 hours ago

Quality article. What a headline. Spicy callouts. Great contrasting.

[–] 4grams@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

at this point, I'm guessing he must be glad his legacy in the middle east will be fulfilled.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 90 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Legacy?

This is his and the parties legacy. They made this. it's a direct result of how first the governed, and then campaigned.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly. His legacy is not doing what he promised, not being that bridge to the next generation. Only giving up his lust for being president when it was too late.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Its beyond the scope of my comprehension, how you can call Trump a fascist one week, and then congratulate him winning the next.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 7 points 20 hours ago

It's easier when you're a fascist that only relinquished power when the mob was at the door.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

same with harris congratulating him. they just can't get over that "we have to be better than them".

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This has the right idea, but they still would be better even if they didn't. Maybe even more better.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, they could conduct a peaceful transfer of power without the congratulations. They would be ruthlessly mocked for being sore losers, but they would be internally consistent at least.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Who cares at this point, they're already ruthlessly mocked, and it's not like they lost a bet, they're handing the keys to the nation over to a massive fire that plans on destroying the country for monetary gain. Fuck em.

[–] bestagon@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

It’s not the right idea. Decorum is just another token of the privileged to distinguish those that make the decisions from those that feel the consequences. Why get incensed at the dismantling of people’s freedoms when you can afford to insulate yourself from any hardship?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 73 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wake up babe, new "this is fine" just dropped

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

Thanks, I hate it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Biden could always have him [official business]ed.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

And how wild would that be? Biden shows up, shakes Trump's hand, then garrotes him. What happens next?

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What happens next?

HUGE sigh of relief from the entire planet.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Only if he goes for a double kill.

I don't know that I'd like President Johnson but I know he can't be worse that President Vance

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just thought the headline by the guardian and the photo they chose of smiling Biden was hilarious. It made me LOL. Could've been an onion headline?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 52 points 1 day ago

And this wonderful line: "The last meeting of these men, combined age 159, in effect ended Biden’s political career....."

Lol...

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 6 points 23 hours ago

is that bismarck? look a lot like it.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Be a shame if someone accidentally dropped some polonium in trump's big Mac.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

His legacy? Try his country.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Indeed. No one gives a flying fuck about any politician's "legacy". How about some concern for the future of this country, FFS.

load more comments
view more: next ›