this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

23 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

Will the Epiphany Transporter finally bring us the flying taxis of the future?

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] S13Ni@lemmy.studio 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Flying cars is a fucking stupid idea.

-constant fear of some drunk driver flying 300kmph to your house -only useful for medium length journey

-has to be heavily controlled for safety, meaning you can only fly specific routes

-airspace of anything important is no fly zone, like airports, government buildings, ports, basically every city

-needs fossile fuel to fly, more than a normal ICE car

-needs designated landing area

-needs city planning to be centered around them

-unlimited potential for terrorists

-drivers would need specific license and training

Whoever is unironically shipping flying cars is a fucking moron and you can't prove me otherwise, no matter if it technically works or not.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Flying cars are the modern equivalent of flying horses

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Flying car = helicopter. All you need to say.

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Even more simple than most of those: people are shit at driving in two dimensions and adding a third is just idiotic.

[–] MJBrune@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I bet you that because flying cars are likely going to be a rich only thing that cities will quickly create new infrastructure to help flying cars become marketable.

[–] Hypx@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Flying cars are literally just helicopters. People need to be aware of what is being proposed here.

[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh, people barely handle driving in 2d. I do not want your average joe trying to navigate 3d.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

People would be backing into treetops and crashing down through people's roofs. Chaos. If we think we have a complex air traffic control situation now, multiply that by 10,000.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

People can't even handle driving on roads without being idiots and assholes about it. Let's keep them out of the sky.

[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

As long as the operators get full rotary-wing commercial flying licences complete with annual physicals and certified log books, I'm fine with it.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Good idea lists move to less efficient personal transport so boomers can have their Jetsons wet dream. Fuck the planet!

[–] PaperDevil@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I hope this never becomes viable in cities at least. Cars are already loud. Imagine how loud flying cars would be.

[–] dwhitnee@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

"The secret appears to be the ducted thrusters along the sides and rear of the Epiphany Transporter, which researchers at NASA's Ames Research Center found in 2002"

"We have every reason to believe in the ability of our proprietary, field-proven ducted thrusters, and leading-edge vehicle design, to perform in flight as expected," Moshier, who is also the CEO and lead designer for the company, said.

I hope they don't get too close to the Titanic...