this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
1199 points (99.2% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

3560 readers
19 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 119 points 4 days ago (4 children)

After the election win, I am no longer that certain in how bad of an investment Twitter was for Musk.

It probably helped the Trump campaign somehow, even if not decisive.

And he will probably get billions in AI subsidies which he will partially spend on licensing Twitter content for AI purposes.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah he didn’t buy a social media site, he bought a propaganda platform

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

and the difference between this one and truth social is you don't have to advertise it to get people to join, since half the population was already on it anyway and most people are too stubborn to leave

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I have a friend that complains about Twitter non stop but refuses to leave. I mock him every time he brings it up.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

BlueSky is a viable alternative, if they find Mastodon too crunchy/not populous enough

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago

This was the point all along, it gave too much power the individuals and now he can manipulate it

He didn't lose money, he just bought a propaganda machine. His image of being a dumb meme man may be mostly true but it's also a perfect cover for fuckery

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 18 points 4 days ago

I used to laugh really hard about that shit as well, but I was apparently just not seeing that the guy was buying an election. I guess I just think too small.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

He did overpay. He could have gotten it for cheaper. Considering how much money he has though, and the other primary investors being the Saudis, it didn’t matter much.

[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Conspiracy theory time. He didn't buy twitter to turn a profit, he did it to control the headlines. For which, he is getting great value for money

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Reminder: He was forced to buy Twitter by a judge and was doing everything he could to avoid buying Twitter.

He is using it to control the headlines, but that's not the reason he bought it. The reason he bought it is that he was forced to. He wanted to back out of the deal.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (5 children)

That doesn’t make any sense because he was the one who offered to buy it in the first place. He signed binding contract to purchase it, then tried to back out prob not because he didn’t want it, but he realized he was overpaying. He has obviously loved owning Twitter as far as the attention and social power he gained.

He should have paid the $1 billion to back out and made another offer, but he’s sleazy, prideful, stingy and stubborn and wanted to back out for free by employing bullshit excuses and lawyers.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

He was trying to do a pump and dump. Buy shares, say he is going to buy at a huge premium, sell when the price shots up. He had already done something similar.

Twitter said they would take the deal and the SEC said follow through or go to jail. So he borrowed heavily against his Tesla stock to buy Twitter at the ridiculous price.

Twitter didn't make enough to pay the interest even before he ran it into the ground. So he has to keep his creditors happy. Saudi Arabia is one if the big ones and they hated people being able to say whatever they wanted on twitter.

[–] brognak@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

IIRC he made a joke offer to buy it in a Tweet at a certain price per share (that was ridiculously high) and because he was literally just sanctioned by the FCC for market manipulation his joke had to become a reality in order for him to avoid serious penalties (the FCC was DONE with his shit at this point).

Everything since then has just been off his dome. Obviously it's pretty bad up in there since it's just a roaring money fire ATM.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

He started out by buying 9% of Twitter and violating financial regulations by not disclosing it. There’s an article with a timeline here: https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/twitter-elon-musk-timeline-what-happened-so-far-rcna57532

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

That was because it was a good deal at the initial price be proposed, but the price went to shit and he tried to get a better price

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 56 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I used to think Elon was just an idiot for buying Twitter and running it into the ground, but now I wonder if he was completely successful in buying a giant megaphone and making sure it only broadcast his pro-Trump propaganda. What does he care if it's not making as much money?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Musk is a useful idiot.

https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musks-twitter-takeover-faces-backlash-over-saudi-financing-1755606

It's not a coincidence, I feel, as it was once a key hub for journalists and Arab Spring activists.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/04/twitter-saudi-arabia-human-rights-abuses

This is why people flocking to Bluesky and not Fedi boggles my brain. Centralisation in the hands of capital is a precarious position to find yourself in if you ever find yourself ever against the state. They now have all of that data handed to them on a silver platter.

\tinfoil_off

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

He is going to get so much contracts for his other companies, not to forget in Russia since he managed to put a kompromat in the white house

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 8 points 4 days ago

This is very plausible. And an argument for why we shouldn't have the ultra rich. No one should be able to do such a thing.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Microsoft is already working on it

[–] awesomesauce309@midwest.social 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Press Ctrl+shift+alt+win L to check their progress.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Does nothing for me :>

Why would I need a LinkedIn hotkey?

[–] awesomesauce309@midwest.social 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Pebcak. I have a feeling you’re not truly pressing the windows button :)

Doesn’t everyone? Microsoft seems to think so.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I'm assuming you mean the super key that some operating systems decided to reuse under a different name.

And uh yes I did press it but why would I use an OS with such a bloated default config? Setting up Hyprland was fun :> (but I never did add that hotkey lol).

[–] paschko_mato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

Does not work on Pop OS

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wait was LinkedIn ever not owned by Microsoft???

[–] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it got acquired in 2016 for $26.2 billion

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ah if only I had graduated on time I would have experienced the pre Microsoft era.

[–] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It was the same, shitty experience it’s always been.

load more comments (1 replies)

"I don't get it. I keep getting applications from LinkedIn and they are all nazis. Every. Single. One of them.

[–] Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Uninstalled it a couple months ago, it's completely useless and just filled with ad spam post of companies I don't fucking care.

Also, the fake job seeking messages you get daily and never respond after you contact them back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joker125@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Musk hedged on turning America into an oligarchy. Will it work? Who knows. However his plan has been to elect a dictator as US president, one that will intentionally crash the US economy so he and his other billionaire buddies can come in and buy every industry for pennies on the dollar.

So thankful for all single issues voters who always fall for the same old shit, over and over again.

Congrat on your signaling. I hope you feel better while begging in bread lines.

[–] CliveRosfield@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I don’t think it was a bad purchase after he succeeded in electing Trump.

[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Nope. His major companies rely on government funding and regulation, and now he's going to be whatever it was called for Trump. A cool 44 billion to actually control parts of government?

[–] CliveRosfield@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They’re indirectly in his pocket. And in my view paying 44 billion to control parts of a government in the most powerful country in existence is nothing to scoff at.

Sort of, but they also benefit from tariffs and lower regulation:

  • Tesla - don't have to cut prices if your competitors have to raise theirs; also, less regulation on cars means he can get to market faster
  • SpaceX - oversight on rocket launches costs money
  • xAI - slashing regulations on AI helps this new company
  • Neuralink - again, regulations are a major limitation here

He is also big into cryptocurrencies, so he stands to gain there as well.

All in all, there's a good chance he makes his $44B back by having Trump's ear and being able to encourage certain changes over others.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

He's going to be in charge of Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago

This is giving him way too much credit, thinking he's some mastermind who engineered this whole thing. He's very wealthy and addicted with twitter, and started amassing a lot of shares of the company. He didn't really care to own it, and instead tried seeing if he could sway Twitter to benefit him, namely by trying to ban the Elonjet account. That didn't work, so he used his classic 420 joke to say he's going to buy Twitter for $54.20 per share, which was way above market rates. He had to be literally sued to purchase the company, after trying to get out of the deal.

Once he was forced to buy the company, it was the company that assumed the debts, not Elon, so it immediately was performing terribly, and Elon had to cut costs, firing employees, not paying rent and server costs, etc. Nothing was planned out ahead of time, the company is flying by the seat of its pants. And arguably the second most prominent user of the platform, the next President, has a competing platform and is directly invested in seeing that succeed, not Twitter/X.

If anything, both Elon and Trump are the modern epitome of failing upwards, exploiting the labor and systems in place to protect Americans, just so they can make more money for themselves. The fact they're celebrated as much as they are is disgusting.

[–] kerrypacker@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

But then where will we find out what distant colleagues did 7 weeks ago?

[–] Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 4 days ago

I can't begin my day without seeing a company I used to work for years ago catered bbq for a customer 3 weeks ago. Complete with pictures of the food and handing out of company branded hats, "we do it the (company name) way!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 6 points 3 days ago

Why’d he bother? He just bought America so he can run everything into the ground.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

LinkedIn only exist for me when looking for a job, definately not a place to stay, i am alergic to toxic positivity

[–] socsa@piefed.social 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Nooooo, I use that so effectively at work! I'm a QA director.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Then what will we use?

I admit I kind of miss bugzilla.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArdMacha@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Is LinkedIn not already a pile of total shite?

[–] auzy@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Not too worried by LinkedIn.

At this point of time though, Facebook is as toxic as truth social, so happy to see that destroyed so s real competitor can replace it

load more comments
view more: next ›