That’s nice, but REforestation should be at 31%
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
81 points (100.0% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5394 readers
320 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That would require a lot more of us in the west to stop eating excessive amounts of meat.
The rain forest is not being burnt by popular or political demand, but market demand. They need to produce, primarily, soy beans to feed cattle in American and European farms. We are the demand side of this, and most of us don't even realize as we criticize the Brazilians for burning their rain forest.
I'm a huge fan of what Lulu is doing here. But he's up against a force that he cannot fight off on his own: Our consumption.
I'm not vegetarian myself, I just treat meat as a rare treat. Everyone can make an effort to eat less meat; how far they are willing to go I'll leave for them to decide. But please decide soon, while there's still some of the Amazon left.
So it's not zero?
Not yet