8k hours is a lot.
That's like PhD level, into a game I've never heard of before now.
Sure, It's trust their input.
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
120 points (96.9% liked)
Games
16919 readers
871 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I've played osrs some 15000 hours but I suck at it.
What's osrs?
Old School RuneScape (I had to Google it)
Thank you for the leg work on looking what it is and then replying, thinly remarking that I could have googled it instead ;)
I wouldn't feel bad about asking here rather than googling it yourself. I like the engagement, personally.
That is over 10 years at 4h a day every single day.
~7 years, but couple breaks lasting up to half a year or something
Isn't OSR a bit "plodding to success" as you can always grind up your skills?
Yeah it kinda is, but the skill ceiling in pvp and pvm is massively high.
There's people who can do all the bosses in game eyes closed without hands and then there's me who can sit clicking that same rock for a year
Oh yeah I remember the mining clicking 😂 with the stone spontaniously combusting 😋
And breaking your pickaxe if you didn't click away lol. Some of the random events were wild lmao
Those are rookie numbers for strategy games.
Competency starts around 1500 hours.
Yup, I'm still a noob in EU4 after nearly 1000 hours. I'll get the hang of it eventually. 😅
Can confirm, still suck at every PDX game despite a thousand or hundreds of hours in them.
I dont care what you say in your review, but if you clock 8000 hours in a game I'm pretty sure you liked it enough to keep playing, or you're actually just addicted and need to seek help.
I will die on this hill
Well, could just have started the game, then went to get the doorbell, got hit by a car on his porch and was in a coma for a year before he could get back to close the game.
I've got some serious time in games I gave bad reviews to. In part because I often get interrupted pause the game and don't get back to it until the next day.
But did you spend 8.000 hours?
Longest is 2,700 for a bad review. Oxygen Not Included. The hours come from a combination of things.
I bought it on a whim the first week of early access so years of on and off playing. Mid game gets super slow and with a stable base there is little danger. So que up some dig, sweep, or build orders and go to bed. 20 minutes of play for 20 hours of run time.
Then the game starts to have problems with performance so sort the junk and fill the world with plastic to simplify calculations.
Then there is the runtime I used running a mod that generated a world checked it's stats and sent the info to a map database.
I played Dark Souls for 80 hours before I thought it was crap. Shit graphics (on the Xbox 360), shit difficulty, no story, thought the game was just one big trollface, tempting you with ideas that might pan out, but don't. I kept playing because everybody else thought it was the best game ever, and convinced myself that it was like other RPGs, where if you grinded enough to get the right gear, you could tame the difficulty. It didn't. Difficulty for older areas was better, but new area difficulty was still shit.
"Game is lethally addictive. 1 star."
It sounds like in the end, he still really likes the core gameplay, but the community has been destroyed some unliked updates to the game, and he's pretty sure that the devs are inflating the steam numbers through private matches with all bots. It's wild how many hours that is, but he probably thinks the game is no longer worth it, amd has sour feelings towards the devs.
If anyone is more interested in the review than the article, here's the text below. It seems like he was also making mods and patches for the game.
REVIEW: Important disclosure here: Prior to the release of BZ98R (and still to this day), I have been a player of the original game up until it's final unofficial patch version 1.5.2.27 U1. This game is entirely based on this community patch. People who have played 1.5 are going to feel differently about the game than people who last played it 20 years ago (1.3, 1.31, 1.4...). The same goes for people who had never played BZ98 in any form prior to purchasing this game. This review involves numerous statements of objective fact but it was still written by someone who was playing 1.5 for years prior to the release of this game. I understand that the release of this game was the first many many people heard of BZ98 being alive but the truth is that it never ceased living - it's good that it brought many back into the fold but it also basically killed the existing community surrounding it. When I heard that this was being made, I instantly experienced fear of what would happen to my beloved game... my fears were well-founded. What follows is my original review:
I've been intending to do this for a LONG time...
In nearly every way, BZ98R is inferior to the final version of BZ98 1.5 (1.5.2.27 U1) that came before it. If 1.5 had things like HUD scaling so I could play at high res and still be able to read text, I'd probably play it instead and advocate that others do so as well.
The graphics "upgrade" is hardly an upgrade when the most interesting feature of BZ1 was lost - destroyed ships flying into several pieces. There is a massive laundry list of SEVERE bugs that did not exist in 1.5 and I am not aware of any meaningful bug in 1.5 that was fixed by BZ98R.
- jump sniping is bugged and exploitable
- satellite reveals everything regardless of radar coverage
- various DAMNING armory-related bugs
- bug related to "perceivedTeam" that has wide-reaching consequences including mildly messing up a campaign mission
- the porting of The Red Odyssey was sloppy and a few missions are meaningfully bugged
If you look on the workshop you will see several LUA patches made by me that deal with many of these problems; I strong encourage people who want to enjoy campaign to subscribe and activate them.
- no "all nations" switch
- no "cloak disabled" switch
- bugged map list in MP (in Steam version, not GOG version)
- very poor netcode performance compared to the old game
I also have a somewhat successful patch for this problem on the workshop as well
- no TCP/IP or LAN option for MP - once Rebellion closes down their BZRNET server, MP is no longer possible.
- random crashes, mostly segfaults, occur at a very high rate
- The mission type that is the backbone of class non-scripted Instant-Action missions is broken and the result is that the game WILL crash about 30% of the time when you try to load a save. I've found ways around this (reimplemented 'Inst4XMission' in LUA) but it requires missions to be patched.
- The CLI argument parser is broken
- heightmap smoothing that is enabled by default when porting old maps (and affects stock ported maps) is detrimental to the terrain in several ways though I know how to override it
still not feasible to repair the mistake with regard to stock maps ...
If it weren't for the fact that this game's release AND Rebellion's policies KILLED 1.5, I wouldn't be likely to have played so many hours of this (I idle a lot, I swear!)
I'm going to stop right here for now. I mainly do not recommend this to people who care much about multiplayer.