this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
1203 points (98.2% liked)

The Onion

4423 readers
2126 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 hours ago

This is unironically true, unfortunately.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The funniest part of this is the idea that there will be an opposition party in anything but a token way after this.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 12 points 5 hours ago (12 children)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] vordalack@lemm.ee 31 points 7 hours ago (8 children)

They ran Harris thinking she would win based on her demographics. The DNC needs to learn that not everyone wants a black/LGBTQ/woman/etc candidate that just runs on their race/gender/sexuality.

They want someone that's competent that will campaign on policies that will make their lives better. The DNC has moved so far away from the working class that the RNC, the party of wealthy creeps, has them.

[–] shadowfax13@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

running token candidates beholden to them is very shady but brilliant strategy by the superpacs :

if they loose: blame it on sexism, racism bigotry to divert the attention from reforms in dnc for progressive leadership. and even if they pretend to be sad about it, the megarich elites and donors get taxcuts and endless price gouging from republicans.

if they win: token candidate passes some token laws which gets either blocked in senate or so poorly implemented that they actually end up giving billions to megacorps for no visible benefit to people. case in point: https://www.atr.org/kamalas-broadband-bust-42-billion-996-days-zero-homes-connected/

[–] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 20 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

They had no platform other than fear mongering about Trump.

The difference between Harris and Obama was that while Obama was biracial that wasn't the focus of his campaign, his platform was, and he articulated it well. That's the real lesson to take away from Obama's success at the polls not let's run a black person and hope we win.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They ran Harris because she was the only viable option when it was clear that Biden was not. They did not run Harris thinking she would win at all, they ran her out of desperation because the incumbent was flatlining. It was not a choice, and it certainly was not one based on demographics. It was a “Hail Mary” and it failed as it was likely to do from the outset, and everyone who was paying attention knew that, yet had no choice but to hope for the best.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

She quite specifically DIDNT run on those things, like Hillary did...so....

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

So every racist and misogynist will say she did anyways.

Including the ones on Lemmy.

I think she, and to a greater extent the policies of the Democratic Party since Carter just cost America the Republic but there is literally nothing a black woman could do to convince some people she's competent in her own right.

Competent at neoliberal corporate cronyism, mind you. But Harris's qualifications by herself are rock solid.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›