this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
788 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
6197 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them,” Sanders said.

“First, it was the white working class, and now it is Latino and Black workers as well. While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change. And they’re right.”

“Will the big money interests and well-paid consultants who control the Democratic Party learn any real lessons from this disastrous campaign?” Sanders asked.

“Will they understand the pain and political alienation that tens of millions of Americans are experiencing? Do they have any ideas as to how we can take on the increasingly powerful Oligarchy which has so much economic and political power? Probably not.”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 64 points 10 hours ago (6 children)

I don’t buy this. In Nebraska there was an election between an independent union leader and a career politician. The union leader lost.

The consensus seems to be that people that voted democrat in 2020 voted republican this time because they experienced inflation under Biden that think it was his fault.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

because they experienced inflation under Biden that think it was his fault.

yeah, that's problem all around the world, people are too dumb to understand how two years of covid and ongoing war in europe affects our lives and demand that someone just takes care of it.

so in a year we will get populist pro-russian billionaire prime minister who will just start dropping more inflation money around and tells people "see? i will take care of you!" (while stealing some of these money for himself, of course)

[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

And Harris was too stupid to just come out and say that she'd do that. Not Trump though. See that huge sign behind him at rallies? "Trump will fix it".

The dem strategy should have been to bombast like Trump, but more. Make America greatER. Would have really taken the wind or of his sails, IMO.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 34 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

In Nebraska

Uh, that's your answer. It's not a magic incantation to win regardless of the odds, but in a presidential election that's by default 50/50?

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

If the problem was that democrats did not support the working class enough then why didn’t the union leader win? This isn’t magic or rocket science. Many people thought democrats were responsible for the high inflation because they don’t know macro economics.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 7 hours ago

It’s not a magic incantation to win regardless of the odds

Sorry, I guess I should have said this twice. You don't win Nebraska just by touching up the progressive message a little. Propaganda still exists, party loyalty still exists, racism still exists. But he did a hell of a lot better than any slow and steady liberal candidate would do. And in races that aren't in deep red states, doing better is enough to win.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

If the problem was that democrats did not support the working class enough then why didn’t the union leader win?

He had the albatross of a poor up-ballot candidate around his neck. Same reason most Democrats lost: The party didn't get people to go out and vote because they didn't appeal to workers, which hurt every candidate that wasn't Republican.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vmaziman@lemm.ee 16 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think what’s missing is the anger. Trump can tap into anger. Bernie could also. The independent didn’t have the base of anger that the GOP did

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Anger definitely motivated some but I know many moderates that were convinced democrats were responsible for the inflation.

[–] vmaziman@lemm.ee 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

But they were right! Dems did contribute to inflation (not as much as Trump but still)…Student loan forgiveness not explicitly tied to higher taxes on rich and corps, cutting back on subsidies to defense, oil, and corn syrup, while also not breaking up monopolies which create an environment of price gouging gave merit to the “democrats give out free cash and devalue it all”

Democrats did cause inflation. They did it by not clipping the wings of our oligarchs when supplying aid.

Biden kept his promise “nothing will fundamentally change” and the American electorate unimpeachably rejected it.

The main thing with Sanders campaign was it didn’t feel like a “democrats” vs “republicans”

It was us vs the billionaires

But the DNC could never bear to alienate their biggest donors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

First of all, it is hard to beat career politicians. They have a track record, experience. Second, you're in Nebraska. Third, and most importantly, the goal is not for a single person to win, but to build a strong organization that will make people's lives better, and that would over time get more people to vote, because they would understand that it matters.

In other words, big corporate Democrats are mediocre at best, and often much worse than that, so of course people stay home. But if you think they're the wave of the future, hey, do whatever you like.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

First of all, it is hard to beat career politicians.

This counters what Bernie said.

Second, you're in Nebraska.

I’m not in Nebraska. Just giving one of many examples of politicians that support the working class losing because of the billionaire class.

Third, and most importantly, the goal is not for a single person to win, but to build a strong organization that will make people's lives better, and that would over time get more people to vote, because they would understand that it matters.

Scapegoating the democrats that tried to tax the billionaire class prevents this from happening.

But if you think they're the wave of the future, hey, do whatever you like.

I don’t think they’re the wave of the future. I think the billionaire class countered Harris because they didn’t want to be taxed like she laid out in her plans and now people are trying to scapegoat them, ensuring it will be less likely that the next person will try it again. Just like the billionaire class wants.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

But the billionaires don't have millions of votes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 43 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change. And they’re right.

Goddamn this hits the exact thing that Democrats really need to learn.

There's a ton of emotion in this nation. Given:

  • The opioid crisis where the people responsible are in perpetual litigation.
  • The wars we fought that costed us deaths of young people who had lives ahead of them, and scarred millions more. All so that a few rich asshats could profit.
  • The corruption of large companies as they swindle the working class, only to watch legislators continue to profit off of insider trading.

And that's just to name a few. There's a ton of emotion in this nation. And Trump, for better or worse, taps into that emotion. The cut and dry democrats, they keep telling us, "The system will work, this time" and you have a public that just screams "well how soon is now then?"

Democrats cannot just keep tapping on the system as it currently stands when the system so obviously doesn't deliver. There are hungry democrats looking for change to the system to form a more better system that will serve them, and the party just keeps dressing the bones of the long gone bird from days long pass.

Sanders fucking sinks the nail in a single stroke of the hammer on this. And Republicans are using that emotion, that pent up distrust of the system as it is, to move people in their direction. The entire point of this living government is to have a government, to have a system, that matches the people who are alive and having to deal with it. Sanders sees that and cut and dry Democrats keep going "but Trump will ruin the system that doesn't work for you!!"

Goddamn, one day, they will learn. Democrats will pick up on what Sanders is saying one day. But holy shit, they are going to clearly take an incredibly long and winding road to get there. I don't agree with where Republicans want to take us. I don't agree with how Republicans want to get there. But goddamn, we've got to hand it to them that they're actively pointing out the exact same thing the Sanders is pointing out. "Status Quo ain't going to fucking work anymore." The sooner the traditional Democrats learn that, the faster they can come back to being relevant.

[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

The single best thing the Dems can do now is take a chapter out of the Republican playbook and obstruct everything, full tilt, no good barred. Inject themselves into everything, all committees, panels, investigations, reviews, etc, and block. See how much Trump can accomplish when the shoe's on the other foot.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Goddamn, one day, they will learn. Democrats will pick up on what Sanders is saying one day.

In the next government, we're not having elections thanks to Harris botching it for everyone. The RBG of presidential candidates. Thinking you know best until it's too late and now we need to plan for the fact you made things worse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] penquin@lemm.ee 40 points 10 hours ago

The "shut up and fall in line while we do nothing for you" bullshit is what got them. Add a full support for a genocide and doing nothing to stop it. A lot of people voted for Trump out of spite to the Dems. They know Trump is worse, but they got burnt by the Dems so many times and they're done with them. I personally voted Harris, but in the back of my mind this is the very last time I'm voting for the " lesser of two evils". I'm just fucking done.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 54 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

We need to MAGA up the liberals. They think liberals were insufferable before, we about had enough of this establishment bullshit.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 14 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I don't know about MAGA, but the Democratic party definitely needs to go hard into the same kind of obstructionism that the Republicans have been doing. No validation of insane policies, no negotiating with terrorists.

And when everyone accuses the Democrats of not cooperating, they need to just stay quiet and stay the course. For the next four years, the legislature is closed.

[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

No. Don't stay quiet. Blame the Republicans!

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 hours ago

Republicans can be evil and Democrats work with them an compromise on killing half of them.

Democrats consider maybe paying postal workers and Republicans stop it and cry how it's unconstitutional to have people paid for their labor.

If the Democrats got a spine and told Republicans "Just shut up, you complained about breaking segregation." And get things done, we'd be a fucking utopia.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 27 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Ngl, Neoliberal Populism sounds bad.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 hours ago

It's sucks so bad. So fucking bad.

[–] shadearg@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Authoritarian Left sounds bad too, but it would nice if they executed the rule of law instead of making excuses to remain politically neutral.

[–] bquintb@midwest.social 10 points 9 hours ago

I'm pretty sure that's what we were trying to do back in 2016, but it was her turn.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago

Check reddit and .world and you'll see the people doing that.

[–] brandon@lemmy.ml 38 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

alienation

Careful now, that sounds like one of them there socialism words.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

No one remembers your name

When you're estranged

When you're estranged

When you're estraaaaaanged

[–] karl_chungus@lemm.ee 27 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I think the time has arrived for party diversification. If the DNC wants my vote back they’ll need to earn it back. I have thrice voted for them to avoid a Trump Presidency, and 2/3 of those attempts were unsuccessful.

No longer will my vote be held hostage by the people that will squander it. From now on I vote for who I want, not against who I don’t, since it apparently doesn’t matter anyway. At least this way I vote on my own terms.

Bernie is too good for us, we need someone like him with a shot at gaining popularity for policy stances not backed by one of the large establishment parties.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It really says something when the media browbeated minorities actively harmed by neoliberal policies into voting Democrat and never third party, and third party didn't even sway anything in any state.

I voted Green in 2016 in California and I regretted it. I voted Democrat in 2020 (knowing it doesn't matter, I live California), despite Sanders getting shafted a second time. I voted Harris in 2024, and I swallowed my morals to do it.

And I got nothing but Trump rolling out his plans his oligarchs planned since 1980.

[–] karl_chungus@lemm.ee 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Exactly. What did it accomplish? Jack shit.

The way to affect change in elections apparently is to unite the larger population around a single person/cause/issue. We just need to find ours and convince enough people.

Personally, I just want a country where we actually let people different than us live and prosper. Why the fuck is that such a hard thing to have???

I have family and friends that are POC, gay, trans, and/or physically/mentally disabled. Why should they have to put up with policies and leaders that vilify them for simply being who they are?

Why do we accept normalized medical debt?

Why do we accept a constantly eroding education system?

Why do we not scale minimum wage consistent to inflation?

I know the real answers, but I think more of the population needs to vote based on the results of them asking themselves why this is the norm and find the candidate willing to fix that shit.

I have a feeling it won’t be an establishment Democrat.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 23 points 10 hours ago

“Will they understand the pain and political alienation that tens of millions of Americans are experiencing? ...”

"Pain? What's that? Some kind of... 'poor-person' thing?? Wait, I remember now, it's the french word for bread! Well, let them eat baguettes~"

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 10 hours ago

Will he finally start a party? Please?

[–] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago

Rollin' out this banger one more time...

https://youtu.be/moNHfeBJ81I

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›