this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
264 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19096 readers
4339 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Montana Republican Senate candidate Tim Sheehy has admitted lacking medical records to substantiate his claim of being shot in combat, a story he maintains despite conflicting accounts.

An ex-park ranger alleges Sheehy accidentally shot himself in 2015 while hiking in Glacier National Park, an incident Sheehy insists was a gun misfire that did not injure him.

Additional controversies surround Sheehy, including accusations of derogatory remarks about Crow Native Americans and scrutiny over financial practices at his former firefighting company.

Despite these issues, Sheehy leads the race against Democratic incumbent Jon Tester.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There is absolutely no way in hell someone in the US military could get away with getting shot in combat where nobody else knew and reported it.

This sounds right, but I'm curious. What specific systems or factors are at play here that make it impossible to hide this? Like what if the reason no one else has come forward now is because the other grunts who were with him that day all later died in combat?

Also - a war wound while defending against the enemy is one thing. But a wound from friendly fire? It almost feels like he wanted to go with the former but changed his story to the latter to come up with a good excuse to avoid having documentation for it...

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

You don't think someone could hide a shrapnel wound from a small arms round?

Lol

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As he repeated to Kelly, Sheehy says he fell while hiking, which made his gun go off – and the only reason he went to the hospital was because he was worried the bullet already in his arm from his service in Afghanistan might have become dislodged.

Holy shit! I've heard some nonsense lies from republicans but this is hilarious. He fell down thought that the bullet lodged in his arm for the last however many years became dislodged, whatever that means.

[–] abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow, you're right. When I first read that sentence I assumed that he meant that the gun went off when he fell down, and it fired into his arm - into his old wound from the war - and that's why he worried the new bullet might have dislodged the old one, along the lines of https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3846953/ or https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5731308/

But then I reread it and it says,

Sheehy himself has sought to parry Peach’s version of events by saying he had never been hit by gunfire that day in 2015.

So you're right. The bullet would have to be dislodged by his act of falling down. I'm not a medical or a firearms expert so I can't say for sure on this point, I can only note that my internet searches don't seem to come up with any other examples of this ever happening.

I guess Sheehy might have gotten irrationally worried over nothing that day - a strong enough fall can do that and much worse to the good ol' noggin, I suppose. But that also means he never tried to get a bullet removed after so many years? Isn't that really dangerous to leave the bullet in? And couldn't the doctors who saw in in 2015 tell if the bullet was recent or really old?

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't buy it. There is no way you can just fall down and knock a bullet out of your arm so that it looks like a fresh bullet wound to a cop and/or doctors.

Also, he has confessed to telling the ranger back then that he shot himself. Surely the ranger would have known he was lying or not if he saw the wound? You're right again - it doesn't add up.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rifle rounds are well known for "lodging" within the first couple of inches of impact.

Pistol rounds ricocheting of rocks however are almost always through and through wounds.

Being shot twice in the exact same space is to be expected as bullets tend to roost is lodging places.

An ancient bullet burial ground?

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You’d think GOP learned their lessons after Noble prize winner astronaut neurosurgeon NFL MVP Hall of Famer Dr. George Santos

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

If Santos didn't like dressing up in drag the right would still be standing by him. The lies weren't what did him in, they were the excuse.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

They did. Santos won.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

Huh, turns out the Republican earlier BS claims of stolen valor for Tim Walz were just talking about the wrong Tim all along

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

"Sheehy, when pressed for evidence of his injury cited the regularly reliable GOP source of 'Trust me, bro'" - Some news probably

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If he was shot while in the military there will be a record.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If it was reported.