In the US, red states have the highest rate of dog ownership, while residents of blue states are more likely to keep a cat as a pet.
So it's all Demo-cats and Re-pup-licans.
this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
54 points (100.0% liked)
Wikipedia
1530 readers
281 users here now
A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.
Rules:
- Only links to Wikipedia permitted
- Please stick to the format "Article Title (other descriptive text/editorialization)"
Recommended:
- If possible, when submitting please delete the "m." from "en.m.wikipedia.org". This will ensure people clicking from desktop will get the full Wikipedia website.
- Interested users can find add-ons and scripts which do this automatically.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
lol you deserve a 👏 for this one
my family had both a cat and a dog. once, a candidate came to visit and try to sway our vote. he made the mistake of picking up our cat, and got his entire face shredded up. anyways, I later learned the guy was a democratic candidate. from there on, I assumed my cat was a hardcore Republican kitty...
Not the republi-cat. 😾
Moṙ æn ekſtencėn v ð nocėn ðæt dȯgz aṙ mæskyulin kodid.
spoiler
More an extension of the notion that dogs are masculine coded.
İt'd bı moṙ ækyṙit t ſeı blu ſteıtſ aṙ moṙ luıklı t displeı ð reıt v kæt onṙcip ƿitc ƿᵫd bı ėbzṙvd i ė noṙmėl ſėſuyitı n ėfliktid buı ð ku̇lt v "No Homo."
spoiler
It'd be more accurate to say blue stares are more likely to display the rate of cat ownership which would be observed on a normal society not afflicted by the cult of "No Homo."
How do we know that the cats didn't cheat?
The dog people would have contributed more, but they likely left their shit in public spaces and/or other people's yards.
I love both a lot. I do feel that cats require more emotional intelligence to understand. Some people have no interest in learning their language, which is complex and just and intricate as dogs. Dogs just on average do more work translating for us