this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
523 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

58965 readers
3964 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

isnt the market itself exactly that?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Long term market rate of return is positive (extremely positive of late), where as casino gambling is EV negative.

But options and futures exist as a short term hedge on equity investment. Combine that with the vig Robinhood takes on the front end in the form of higher contract prices, and you end up with an EV negative return - more consistent with high stakes gambling than equity investing.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I class market trackers as investing rather than gambling.

Sure they can still go down (and by a lot), but it tends to be big events like COVID that do that, and it soon bounced back up again.

If you're investing more than a few percent of your portfolio in any one company, you're probably gambling though. And sure, nVidia look a safe bet today, but if Sam Altman comes out tomorrow and goes "sorry guys, this ain't going anywhere" then you'll lose over half your money before you can blink.

I wouldn't invest on a timeframe of less than a few years either. It's not for boosting your rent money. It's just better than leaving your spare money in cash. If the concept of "spare money" is alien, then it's probably not for you.

[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

If you're investing more than a few percent of your portfolio in any one company, you're probably gambling though.

I read a forum post many years ago about people that put all their retirement money into some company that was going to be the sole supplier for some components for the iPhone. Apple didn't end up going with them, and the company was relying entirely on that contract. The company went bankrupt, and the people that invested lost all their money.

In the end, why invest in a small number of companies when you can invest in practically all of them? Bogleheads three fund portfolio (total US stock + total world stock + bonds) is very simple yet will beat most actively-managed portfolios over the long run.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 34 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Let's be honest, most share trading is more like gambling than it is like investing.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I work for a publicly traded company and I have some visibility into what’s happening with our products and business. Then I read the Y! Finance page about our stock and it’s all weird math trends analyses and absolutely zero about our company, its fundamentals, and the future of our business. Stock trading is just a bunch of assholes trying to sift the sea of numbers to divine a magic formula. The irony is that their own behavior drives the price changes, so they are feeding straight into the data they are trying to read and act on. What a circle jerk.

[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

The market is wild sometimes. I work for a fairly large company. Sometimes in our earnings reports, we exceed EPS and revenue expectations (which is good of course), but don't exceed them as much as some analysts think we'll exceed them, so the stock goes down. The expectation is that we'll always exceed the expectations lol

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Yes, and good news about the company can drive the stock price down, if enough people decide that that’s probably a high point for the near future and a good time to sell and take profits.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Let's be honest, our "free market" is a regular casino for the plebs that own about 10% of shares in their 401ks and Robinhood accounts, and an intentionally rigged casino for the oligarchs that own the rest, with marked insider information cards, and loaded market manipulation dice.

Gotta love when the bootlickers defend this economy, and market investment, as somehow inclusive, when 93% of stocks are owned by 10% of Americans.

(Saved Fortune article) https://archive.ph/DW0A8

It would suck if working class Americans lost their retirement money due to Wall Street getting what they deserve. But what sucks more is that our retirement system is based on letting rich people gamble with your money in the first place!

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I guess it depends on your main goal. I started out as a gambler then lost a bunch of money and started actually investing. But at the end of the day every transaction you make can be called a gamble.

[–] fpslem@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

I just want to tip my hat to Elizabeth Lopatto's writing in this piece. I miss following her on twitter and had forgotten how spicy and on-target she can be. Good stuff.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

They're almost there…

[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (22 children)

All these copium defend the market takes, you telling me Tesla, a failed venture living off government subsidies, is worth 16x more than the hundred year old Ford that actually makes a profit without fraud?

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

a failed venture

Bruh wut.

living off government subsidies

Are you referring to the consumer incentives to buy electric? Not only are these ending, but they’re some of the least hinky government subsidies of business in the economy, because they go direct to the consumer. Have you seen what our government does for corn farmers and big oil? Oh right, corn and oil: those other “failed ventures” LOL

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Tesla, a failed venture living off government subsidies

It's not a failed venture precisely because it lives off government money. Show me a Fortune 500 company and I'll show you a large stream of public sector receipts.

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 15 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Tesla stock prices in the expectation that they'll have robotaxi services and general purpose robots in the near future. And also that they will be leaders in these fields, ahead of the competition.

How likely/unlikely that is to happen is debatable, but that's why some people are valuing the company so high right now.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 14 hours ago

Hi-tech tulips.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 18 hours ago

It's also why he's hanging it all on Trump right now.

That's what he's after - the complete deregulation of self-driving safety standards in the US.

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

"Debatable" is a heavy stretch for someone with a 0% track record when it comes to promised tech while repeating "we can do it NOW and it will be available NEXT YEAR!" for a literal decade. Robo taxies were supposed to be EVERYWHERE 4 years ago. Same with SpaceX, we were supposed to be sending the first people to mars this year, yet all Elon has managed was burn 3 bilion tax payer dollars for literal fireworks, as not a single "starship" managed to reach high orbit. Even the cybertruck is a cheap knockoff of what was promised. Not to mention the countless people that have died because he's allowed to beta test his death machines in public. Can't forget his starlink shenanigans in Ukraine, fucking warlord wannabe... Elon is the greatest scam artist in modern history, and it's absolutely disgraceful that he isn't behind bars, let alone valued at all.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What? The stock took a huge hit after that reveal. It's a cult of personality.

[–] hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, because the market went from having the opinion of "I'm 80% sure that Tesla is going to do this robo taxi, automaton thing" to " I'm 65% sure that Tesla is going to do this robotaxi, automaton thing". Things are rarely all or nothing with the market.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

I'm 80% sure he's going to do it, and 100% sure it'll be a disaster if he does.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] taanegl@lemmy.ml 153 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Bruh, wtf you think stock trading is? Buying into funds is just hiring professional gamblers to work for you, "insider trading* is cheating and dark pools is just the high rollers table.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

In gambling, the house always wins, by extracting value from the players. In stock trading, the players (capitalists) collectively always win, by extracting value from labor, technological growth, and natural resources. These are not the same picture.

Sure, you can take on as much risk as you like using derivatives, and emulate a gambler using the stock market as a source of randomness (volatility). But that's not how most traders behave, and it's not how most traders' payoffs work.

[–] msage@programming.dev 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

90% of users lost money while trading

the end result is very much the same

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Damn, I’m up over 100% since I downloaded it seven years ago. Thank you, ETFs and tech companies I dig!

[–] Verat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Same, looks like I'm not part of that 90% either, only 4 years account age here.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 14 hours ago
[–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Nice story, bro.

I'm also up, more years, not Robinhood.

Then you glance over to Wallstreet Bets, they are the direct opposite on the curve.

Yet still almost everyone loses money on exchanges, for various reasons which I don't want to spend time writing up.

But market has been irrational for many years, with no signals of slowing down.

[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

I mean, I feel most people who lost money were doing "options trading", basically full on gambling/speculation. If you had put that money in an s&p500 index fund, chances of losing money are slim.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Great. Now how about Citadel's $65 Billion in securities sold but not purchased? Just kickin that can, eh?

Hard to see how the SEC and DTCC aren't complicit.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Citadel commands something like 8-10% of daily market volume. They're the textbook Too Big To Fail investor. SEC won't touch them for that reason alone, although there are plenty of other ideological/conflict of interest reasons, too.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I don't disagree, but it's the whole REASON the SEC was created in 1934.

If anyone needed further proof of end-stage capitalism, it's this goddamn insistence on regressive everything.

Anything deemed "Too Big To Fail" is also a national security risk. Nationalize the whole firm, send the executives off with whatever loot they already have, and ironclad legalese to prevent them from ever setting foot in a financial market again.

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Weren't they one of those blocking early GME?

[–] db2@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They turned off the buy button when it was about to squeeze.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Even before that they have been accused of not buying stocks ordered by users, then buying at sell order and waiting for the price to raise to sell so they get a profit. It's been questioned a long time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›