this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
82 points (95.6% liked)

PC Gaming

8441 readers
697 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 20 points 11 hours ago

How is he supposed to make line go up if no free government moneys?

[–] gregs_gumption@lemm.ee 69 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

This reticence to give out CHIPS Act funding right away apparently stemmed from fears from the government that Intel specifically would not meet its promises. “[There is fear that] Intel is going to take chips money, build an empty shell of a factory and then never actually open it, because they don’t have customers,” said former Commerce Department official Caitlin Legacki.

Honestly this seems like rare reasonable move by the federal government.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 6 hours ago

Thanks. I was hoping someone would shed light in the comments.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 15 points 13 hours ago

I am a bit shocked they got a back bone left...

There is more to this story.

Endless state aid while peasants are being driven into poverty finally being recognized but the state?

Jk

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, 'take the money, build an empty factory' is what tech companies do when you give them a money helicopter.

Maybe we should stop giving them any money and just nationalize these failed businesses that need bailouts? (Yes, yes, Intel isn't failed - yet - but my point is still valid.)

If they're important to the national security or whatever, then they're important enough to go through that process for too.

[–] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 hours ago

"We took your $8.5 billion and instead of building 8.5 billion dollars worth of extra capacity, we built the capacity we were in the process of building anyway and used 8.5 billion dollars of our money to buy back stock"

[–] the_shitshow_never_ends@lemmy.world 55 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 13 points 15 hours ago

So they can buy back more shares

[–] Klanky@sopuli.xyz 29 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Now he knows how us regular people feel when we have to fight insurance and the doctor’s billing office to get them to code/process the claim correctly and keep calling to bug them for the refund check and it still takes over a year. Welcome to the real word.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 11 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I mean, I guess he gets a tiny fraction of that, since this won't ruin his company or him financially for the rest of his life if it doesn't work out, nor does he actually put in the work any further than a phone call that his assistant sets up. The rest is all done by various departments, all he does is wait for an email saying it's been recieved.

[–] Klanky@sopuli.xyz 7 points 16 hours ago

That’s a great point. Don’t want the poor whittle CEOs to have to actually do any work for their ridiculous salaries.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

this won't ruin his company or him financially for the rest of his life if it doesn't work out

It wouldn't be the only thing but I think there's a nonzero chance that something like this is one key step in a spiral that forces Intel into bankruptcy. Their inability to get their foundry business off the ground currently threatens their long term prospects, and if they get stuck in a place where the government won't trust them because they don't have customers, and the customers won't trust them because they don't have the money, then that might truly lead to the end of the company, with his business decisions taught in business schools as a case study.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 79 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The U.S. government put some objectives between CHIPS Act recipients and their money, with milestones including completing building projects, securing customers, etc. “Obviously, with elections, you know, nigh in front of us, hey, we want this done,” said Gelsinger, with the possibility of a new presidential regime lighting a fire of urgency.

Imagine having to do something for your 8.5 billion fucking dollars.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 30 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Why won't the government just give them the money and trust that they'll do what they said? It worked out great paying companies to roll out fiber years ago, that's why we're all on reliable, high speed fiber internet today.

[–] Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who works in the telecommunications industry, look up RDOF.

Not only is it a HUGE timeline that does nothing to incentivize actually completing a project early, but the main RDOF winner in my area has only wireless service available with zero construction projects planned except to put up more wireless equipment.

It also means those areas that company claims they’ll serve one day are ineligible for any more grant money and now that companies that are willing to bring fiber to those homes have to pay a boatload out of pocket while the RDOF winner just hangs out and watches.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 13 hours ago

When the government is spineless, this is what the corpos do.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 15 hours ago

Thank you daddy

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 33 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine having to Actually do something instead of just saying we plan to do this, money plz.

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, what are these guys? Cable companies?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 15 hours ago

nATaiNaL SCuRitY

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 39 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm so sick of these welfare queens crying all the time.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 11 hours ago

They even kill babies (startup competitors). They don't deserve the handout.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Get in line intel I'm still waiting for my 1200 from covid

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I am still living off mine

[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, haven't had to work since I got my covid stimulus. Been on vacation ever since.

[–] Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I own three houses and rent out two others thanks to my $1200 stimulus check.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Dang, guess I should have invested mine like you instead of putting it toward student loans.

[–] gassygiant@discuss.online 2 points 5 hours ago

I bought GME with mine. RIP

[–] Aceofspades@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You paid off debt? How do you ever expect to get ahead doing that?

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 2 points 8 hours ago

Well my goal is more of a "get out" than "get ahead." But maybe that attitude is why I'm not more of a winner.

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 24 points 18 hours ago

Has he tried to stop sucking?

Maybe just admit that the only reason he's still the CEO of anything is because of DOD contracts and STFU.

[–] grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Grown man on his knees begging

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Grown man on his knees "begging"

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

'Tis the season (Locktober)

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like he don't think Trump is going to pay.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. I can understand being nervous that Putin won't approve spending money on national defense investments.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

national defense investments.

Wierd way to name a cash transfer. Is US Treasury taking equity stake for their contribution here?

Asking for a friend

[–] Ashtear@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's 2024. National defense infrastructure isn't just oil and steel anymore, it's silicon.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 6 hours ago

Will US recieve equity position for their "investment"

[–] Jagothaciv@kbin.earth 8 points 16 hours ago

Lets not pay them a dime and then nationalize them lol

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 15 hours ago

"My simple message is, 'Boost share price before I get shown the door,'" said Gelsinger in an interview with the New York Times.