this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
670 points (98.0% liked)

Housing Bubble 2: Return of the Ugly

296 readers
439 users here now

A community for discussing and documenting the second great housing bubble.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago

This makes the housing market sound similar to Diamond marketing.

[–] scaryjelly@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Spread the joyful message that squatting is an option!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShadowFlower@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like it's time to start burning shit down

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Be a shame if someone burned em all down and we all just started over.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You mean if someone burned them down and blackrock got an insurance payout valued higher at the homes were worth allowing them to build lower quality replacements and rent it out at an even higher price to people because it's new and driving the average home price even higher? Yeah, that would be a shame

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

If it was a one time thing, sure, but if unoccupied properties had a meaningfully higher risk of arson to the point where it's priced into insurance, there would be less of an incentive to hoard housing.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

Meanwhile insurance prices go up for everyone else, and housing supply goes down, making cost of housing higher still

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean you SAY shame......I would feel shame.....

Hey, we got any pyromaniacs in the house? We got a thing to do!

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Hmm what's gonna happen to these rich landowners?

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sure, and we can develop plans for where people must live and what jobs they must have. Maybe a new national plan every five years.

….. we know how well that’s worked in the past

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Do you want your housing to be on the line every election? Just look at what Trump is saying today about removing immigrants and liberals from jobs and country.

No imagine he's your new landlord too.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I didn't mean nationalize all housing. I meant this specific company.

[–] Rebels_Droppin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I'd hope that if housing was nationalized, people would vote past identity politics if government was more intertwined in their daily lives.

[–] Rubisco 2 points 2 days ago
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'm no anarchist, but....

Just a ~~couple~~ 3000,000 pipe bombs...

Just sayin'... Social problem solved.

Edit: I just ruined my chances of holidaying in the US.

[–] mostdubious@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

you're talking to a large collection of cowards here unfortunately.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›