this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
898 points (99.1% liked)

Memes

45450 readers
2061 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You will go straight to jail 😑😑😑

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 1 points 3 minutes ago

my browser always asks if I want the simplified view which always bypasses the paywall

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 4 points 1 hour ago

DO NOT DISABLE JAVASCRIPT USING AN EXTENSIONS BECAUSE THAT WILL MAKE TRACKING STOP WORKING AND BYPASS PAYWALLS.

[–] Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 hour ago

Firefox has a button that shows up in the url that kind of turns the webpage into an e-book-esque view that pops up for most articles (especially Pay Wall)

[–] attero@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 hour ago

You would never use DuckDuckGo as your default search engine and then type !archiveis in front of your urlbar visiting a news site.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 12 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)
[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 23 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Doesn't NYT cut off most of the article now? I used to just be able to disable JS but that didn't work anymore last I checked.

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

I use this extension and it lets me bypass pretty much every paywall including NYT's

[–] hunt4peas@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 hours ago

Best extension along with uBlock Origins!

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Yeah the article stub doesn't link to the article. It links to a login flow with the article id. If you go directly to the article you get redirected if you don't have a session.

It's incredibly easy to make an impossible to get around paywall. Porn has done it since the Internet existed.

In this very particular situation I'm glad most companies are lazy and stupid.

I don't particularly care if a company does pay only content. I think its legitimately ok. I hate companies that don't make you pay enough for the service to cover their costs thus leading to complete enshitifaction.

[–] ChuckEffingNorris@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I thought the issue was they wanted search engines to be able to see the content, but not non paying viewers? Hence slightly shitty paywalls.

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Eh you're right of course. Like I said below. Search engines have become useless anyway..

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

It's incredibly easy to make an impossible to get around paywall.

Sure, but the easily-bypassed js method makes sure it’s still crawlable by search engines, which is a trade well worth making where I work. Doesn’t matter as much for porn sites since the title and description aren’t the content most people are there for, so you can expose them on the paywall page.

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

Maybe they have a way to unblock major search engine crawlers but block it for everyone else now? I know Cloudflare was doing something similar for some bot protection mechanism, and this seems like something news outlets would want to do also.

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Very true. I don't disagree at all. I think once google finally becomes totally useless. It won't matter.

I mean Google is already just Yellow Pages AdWords edition with AI content

[–] polysics@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Brave browser has a filter to bypass paywalls. Works on desktop and mobile versions. Definitely works on NYT as I just read something there today. And of course has built in adblock. You can also add additional filters and adblock lists.

Bonus: print to PDF in Brave to share an article with someone else. It retains all the graphics relevant to the article and cuts all the junk and ads out too.

[–] spamspeicher@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

For that to work you have to use Brave browser. Ewwww. Firefox does the same with add-ons.

[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

Absolutely do not inspect elements and start deleting stuff! Leave them alone!

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

excellent psa

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I always break the ctrl key right off my keyboard when I get a new computer so I don't accidentally do this.

[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

I do that with the windows key...

[–] polysics@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Brave browser has a filter to bypass paywalls. Works on desktop and mobile versions. Definitely works on NYT as I just read something there today. And of course has built in adblock. You can also add additional filters and adblock lists.

Bonus: print to PDF in Brave to share an article with someone else. It retains all the graphics relevant to the article and cuts all the junk and ads out too.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 110 points 11 hours ago (9 children)

12ft.io almost never works for me tbh.

Also, appending before something is called prepending, similar to how a prefix after something is a suffix.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 51 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Archive.is is definitely not an alternative that people should use in this situation

[–] SolarMonkey 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Nor archive.ph, which appears to be the same site? Idk how that works. Definitely not a site anyone should go to, though.

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 hours ago

Nor archive.md nor archive.today, which appear to be run by the same rogue actors and serve the same content as archive.is and archive.ph. Beware.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

we all need to consider, it costs money to fund quality journalism. we have to be aware of the many forces working against basic silly journalism, like what's happening at the school board.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 64 points 11 hours ago (10 children)

Definitely don't use uBlock Origin's zapper mode to get rid of elements on the page that are blocking your view.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Then you just get an unblocked half an article

[–] Souroak@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 hours ago

On mobile Firefox, two right swipes in the middle of the screen closes zapper mode. It is not clear or obvious, but it works.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 17 points 9 hours ago

"Append...before", AKA "prepend"!

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

there's no new big wall of information from the NY Times. ask them, what's the scoop? my opinion, take a moment. wtf are you doing?

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί