this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
262 points (96.1% liked)

World News

38870 readers
3008 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Societal collapse is the best thing that can happen right now, capitalism will not save the workers nor the environment. Only a complete revolution can save the workers, the environment, and the future of humanity.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

societal collapse

Ah yes, that thing that has us laboring to chase meaningless plastic crap we're brainwashed into needing instead of growing our own food and maintaining our own shelters as small, purposeful communities, all so the owners of this society can siphon our energy while poisoning the earth, all to live like wannabe gods above us.

No more penis Space tourist rockets? What a loss...

I know, we all weep for our poor capitalist lords :c

/s

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That's old news, no? I recall reading that basically from 2°C there is no more economic growth, what means a lot of people are thrown under the bus. From 3°C there is no more economy, meaning no food, heating, fighting everywhere. From 4°C there is basically no more humanity.

[–] ProdigalFrog 11 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

That sounds pretty extreme. I'd be Interested in reading that article, if you can find it.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It's mild hyperbole, but it's not far off from best-guess speculation. It's well and regularly covered in IPCC reports. Have at.

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/

I'm looking at the Full Volume, and on page 71 you can see

With about 2°C warming, climate-related changes in food availability and diet quality are estimated to increase nutrition-related diseases and the number of undernourished people, affecting tens (under low vulnerability and low warming) to hundreds of millions of people (under high vulnerability and high warming) ... Climate change risks to cities, settlements and key infrastructure will rise sharply in the mid and long term with further global warming, especially in places already exposed to high temperatures, along coastlines, or with high vulnerabilities (high confidence).

At global warming of 3°C, additional risks in many sectors and regions reach high or very high levels, implying widespread systemic impacts, irreversible change and many additional adaptation limits (see Section 3.2) (high confidence). For example, very high extinction risk for endemic species in biodiversity hotspots is projected to increase at least tenfold if warming rises from 1.5°C to 3°C (medium confidence). Projected increases in direct flood damages are higher by 1.4 to 2 times at 2°C and 2.5 to 3.9 times at 3°C

Global warming of 4°C and above is projected to lead to far-reaching impacts on natural and human systems (high confidence). Beyond 4°C of warming, projected impacts on natural systems include local extinction of ~50% of tropical marine species (medium confidence) and biome shifts across 35% of global land area (medium confidence). At this level of warming, approximately 10% of the global land area is projected to face both increasing high and decreasing low extreme streamflow, affecting, without additional adaptation, over 2.1 billion people (medium confidence) and about 4 billion people are projected to experience water scarcity (medium confidence). At 4°C of warming, the global burned area is projected to increase by 50 to 70% and the fire frequency by ~30% compared to today

However, if you really want to get into it, you can read the Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Full Report. It has a lot more details about the effects of climate change on all parts of the world, but it's also a 3,000 page pdf.

[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 58 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Humanity is fucked. My sympathy lies with the animals.

[–] bassad@jlai.lu 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Animals are fucked! We decimated 75% of wildlife in 50 years, and it is still growing

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

If only we'd only "decimated" wildlife. Alas.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I sympathize with the children that had nothing to do with it.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

That's all of us unless you're an executive in a multinational corp, or work for the oil and gas industry.

We've all been ramrodded into this reality by a handful of giant Corporations, over the last 100 years.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I agree. But I could have chosen more fuel efficient cars when I was younger. Bought less shit I didn't need. I could've done more. Yeah it's not entirely my fault, we've been thrown into the gauntlet, what can you do if you wanna live? But the children born now, or God forbid even later are going to find themselves in a hellscape of an economy and ecosystem. And my heart goes out to them because they'll get less than I had, less freedom, less upward mobility, less drinkable water, less food, less breathable air, and be more fucked by everything. The longer we push it, the worse it gets for the people who had less to do with it.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

If it helps to assuage your guilt at all, we have been living, inundated with corporate propaganda, for all our lives.

"Carbon footprint" is a great example; it's a Corporate guilt trip.

https://interestingengineering.com/culture/carbon-footprint-coined-by-big-oil-to-blame-you-for-climate-change

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Oh absolutely. The carbon footprint was bullshit from the oil companies to put the onus on individuals to fix it while not giving people any options. It was all bullshit. That being said, I do have some guilt. Or at least feel it. Less because I was making bad decisions and more of a "survivors guilt" kind of thing. That's not the right term, cause I'm going to die before the younger generations. But I feel guilt just because my child and millions of others will get a worse and worse end of the stick than I got just because of when they were born. This is why I argue with boomers about the difference between generations.

Like, you had the American dream fucking handed to you. Do you not feel some kind of guilt for getting a degree for $8k, a house for $35k, and a top of the line vette costing $4.5k? Even at the lower rates of pay, that's a fraction of the budget compared to today. If I had it that easy, I would absolutely feel bad for people coming up behind me. And yet, VERY few boomers acknowledge this, and that is why I'm so hostile to them.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

"Generation Me" will never cop to their culpability. They're narcissists, ie to admit being wrong now would absolutely crumple their sense of identity. And we all know Boomers #1 rule is looking out for numero uno.

I'm not saying all Boomers are Captain Planet villains...but all Captain Planet villains were definitely Boomers.

[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It’s why I’m not having kids.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

So you won't feel guilty for not fighting for a better world?

[–] Gointhefridge@lemm.ee 77 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

We can't even figure out how to not have half our society be rasict, how the hell are we gonna save a whole planet from our fuckery?

[–] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 78 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

We're not gonna be able to combat climate change under capitalism anyway. The number one thing we need to do is to produce less but that goes directly against what capitalism needs to function. Not to mention that governments are bribed by companies to make laws in their favour.

But hey, what's the point of saving our planet anyway if we can't maximize profits anymore?

[–] Frittiert@feddit.org 20 points 11 hours ago

Yep. And if you mention this, you're a commie and capitalism is the greatest thing ever and under socialism we will all starve and have nothing and it never worked look at Cuba.

Like capitalism works, and there are no imaginable alternatives.

Just don't use resources to produce that much useless crap to just dump it in a landfill or burn it? Is it so hard to understand?

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Bold of you to assume that most people even want that. From what I can tell...

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 25 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There are a large number of people out there who seem to be deliberately making it worse - not even for profit, but just out of spite.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 6 points 11 hours ago

Tbf, I think a certain minimum amount of intelligence is required to even qualify for that statement, which I suspect disqualifies most... but yeah, underneath that, there do seem to be a few, like Jeff Bezos.

Though Donald Trump himself I see more like a monkey doing its thing, as much a symptom as a feed-forward cause of his own. I ain't saying that he's not "evil" in his own way, just that he lacks sufficient character for his brand of it to have had any effect at all, if it weren't for the fact that the systems were so broken to begin with. Money (his father's in his case) corrupts.

[–] BrightCandle@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

We don't and we won't.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 30 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

You know what would be useful in a societal collapse? Electric vehicles and solar panels.

Hopefully peppers aren’t building zombie busses because they’ll be useless in 6 months after the oil stops flowing.

An ev with a charger panel and bicycles will be useful indefinitely.

[–] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Solar panels and batteries require massive supply chains. They require our rarest minerals and highest tech, with highly educated workers to develop and produce and state of the art clean rooms and factories.

If we stop producing them, the current stock will be useful for like 50 years tops. Then it's back to fossil fuels, I'm afraid. Diesel generators last for a long time, and they're easier to maintain and produce.

I remember i read a doomer theory stating we should be stockpiling coal for the humans that remain to rebuild society since there is nothing we can do at this point and fossil fuels is the only thing that will outlast the collapse. I'm not that pessimistic, but i can see what they mean.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Lol, Diesel can on average only be stored for 6 to 12 months before degrading. Good luck with that.

If a collapse ever happens I'd rather have solar panels and an EV. Fuel production and transport would instantly grind to a halt and the existing fuel goes bad soon after.

[–] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

Yeah, it's true diesel degrades quickly, but oil does not. Depending on where you live, you could more quickly set up a low scale refinery than a solar panel manufacturing workshop. Most likely, people would use coal in most places without access to oil in short distance since it's more widely available and simpler to use.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 hours ago

Mate, we are talking about a societal collapse. You won't have oil available and you won't be able to refine your own diesel at home (especially without energy).

Your argument about solar panels being difficult to produce is utterly out of place. Your diesel generator and your car are more difficult to produce, but you already own them from before the downfall. So if you own an EV and you own solar panels then it doesn't matter how difficult those are to produce when you're just using them.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago

Gas only lasts like 6 months before expiring. It can be stabilized to last a couple of years, but within 3-5 years all existing gas would be unusable (as far as I understand it).

Running a solar system past its ideal life when it holds even 20% of a charge and has lower efficiency is better than nothing.

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 18 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

When society collapses, upwards of around 95-100% of us die. That's reality.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 hours ago

I’ll probably be one of them.

[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 hours ago

"We don't know who struck first, us or them. But we do know it was us that scorched the sky..."

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

you would get murdered for those rather quickly, i'd imagine. what would be useful is to get far away from strangers somewhere defendable near fresh water.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That would be only one of the many competing reasons for my murder.

I do have camping gear, woodworking hand tools, a good bike, I know how to shoot and clean fish+game and cook, and I have knowledge of some remote areas with sparse populations including their flora.

On paper it all sounds good, but I would likely die miserably in the first Canadian winter.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

I generally never last very long in a playthrough of The Long Dark

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 9 hours ago

Don't worry, we'll fix climate change by reflecting sunlight before it hits the Earth's surface. Of course this will eradicate most pests (and nature) but hey, problem solved!

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's why Musk is backing Trump and Putin and trying to turn the world into Thunderdome. EVs will reign supreme.

[–] yngmnwntr@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 hours ago

Pretty sure Thunderdome itself hit the nail on the head with Methane cars, easier and more sustainable than either EG or ICE.