this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
16 points (78.6% liked)

Linux

48216 readers
1097 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
16
IBM, Red Hat and Free Software: An old maddog’s view (www.lpi.org)
submitted 1 year ago by nils@feddit.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.space 5 points 1 year ago

Thanks for posting this! It was a long read, and while I was familiar with a lot of the history, I learned some new things.

As I've said before:

I would support Red Hat if they only made their free software offerings available to paying customers. I think this is how a free software company should work. Most free software is not sustainable today, and it would be nice if Red Hat could be a good example of how to build a successful free software company.

Even if Red Hat terminates the contracts of customers who share the sources, this wouldn’t be against the GPL, but I think it would be nasty to scare your customers into not exercising their granted freedoms under the GPL.

My position is that I don’t think this is how a free software company should behave, but I’ll refrain from voicing any further opinions until Red Hat actually terminates a customer’s contract for redistribution.

[–] garam@lemmy.my.id 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I will say from business perspective, Red Hat already give offer to anyone.. And it's centos stream code, you can rebuilt it as same as RHEL, and it's open source. And it's GPL...

So let it be like that, and with Almalinux working together, everything will be stronger than ever.. At least CIQ can suck up their contract, that resold Red Hat code and never support upstream ever.. And stole about 30% of RHEL corporate market with cheap and no labor cost.. So whatever...