this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
170 points (98.9% liked)

LGBTQ+

2660 readers
256 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Can I be hoisted to Wales first please I like living but not on terf island

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

LGBT people will be allowed to leave, and we won't test whether anyone's "gay enough," because we're not monsters.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So they're going to send him back to be killed.

It doesn't matter if he's gay or not. The bigots do not care. He said the bad words so he must die now.

Fucking bureaucrats think they're being clever but really they're just executing a human rights travesty.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This is conservatism. It cannot stop on its own. It can only be stopped by force.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Reading it again, where the judge calls it a lifestyle, I wonder if this is actually the desired outcome on the judge's part.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

There is no such thing as a "good conservative". Conservatism is a plague of oppression and death that is long overdue for a cure.

I do not believe there is a peaceful solution to this disease. As long as conservatives continue to exist on earth, LGBTQ+ people and other oppressed classes will continue to be persecuted.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 3 hours ago

this makes me think about the first episode of kims convenience. you no getta discount but you getta discount.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago

Oh you're gay? Prove it.

rips off judge's robe

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 27 points 11 hours ago

The whole thing is rediculous.

Also it's now 6 years later and he's still in limbo awaiting the result of an appeal.

[–] krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] greencactus@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Well, he just has to have active sexual intercourse in front of the judge with multiple witnesses. What's the problem, I mean if that's his lifestyle he should just prove it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

(/s - seriously, how more obviously homophobic can the judge be)

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

Just do it with the judge, that'll show him.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 67 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The court declared him not gay enough. That's got to hurt.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 39 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And then what? He just gets sent back to whatever country after having gone through a widely published court case where he admitted to be gay?

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Yeah but they ruled him straight. He has paperwork.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 40 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

That's fucking vile

However, submitting a photograph of yourself looking at gay porn is fucking hilarious

[–] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 10 hours ago

And that still wasn't gay enough

They should have got a photo of the moment he started blasting rope to Waluigi r34, that would have cinched it

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

The problem with having to prove you're gay is that most gay people don't live their lives collecting documentary evidence of their gayness. So you unless you have contact details for a whole load of same-sex partners willing to testify that you banged, you have to contrive evidence. And then the fact that the evidence looks contrived counts against you. You can't win, and the law is an ass.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 hours ago

Especially if you are fleeing a homophobic regime. You've probably done everything possible to avoid leaving evidence.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 11 hours ago

What evidence do they even want, your sextape? Perverts

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 13 points 13 hours ago

Oh absolutely 100% I agree. I understand why they did it. Its just a really funny thing.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

They better not be fudging the immigration figures by leaving off Paddington