this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
731 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

12540 readers
427 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 228 points 2 months ago (6 children)

i wonder why nobody signed the farewell card for the type of ass to sue for not getting a farewell card.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 48 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What's the opposite of eating the onion? I read your comment and scoffed, wondering who could actually believe this. The I saw the "Not" in the comm name.

[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] roscoe@startrek.website 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I vote for this to become official.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I'm leaning towards either, "Fabricating The Onion," or "Puking The Onion." I think the first is a more accurate assessment of the situation though.

Edit: both my suggestions aren't any good next to "Picking/Plucking The Onion."

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're getting played by this misleading article. There is no evidence that anyone didn't sign the card because they didn't like her. If you follow the link to the actual article, there were two other people who didn't get cards either for the same reason. It's not in that articles, but I read elsewhere that because this happened during COVID it was just difficult to get people to sign them.

The woman sounds like a dope, but most people are kind and would sign the card anyway. Most people aren't looking to get petty revenge against people they don't even know that well.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Except unlike those others, this woman sued (for a bunch of things, not just the card thing), and the judge dismissed all of them saying she displayed a victim mentality over normal office interactions. I'm not faulting people for assuming she's not very likable.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] vxx@lemmy.world 166 points 2 months ago (27 children)

The judge added that Conaghan exhibited a "conspiracy-theory mentality" and misinterpreted "normal workplace interactions" as harassment. The example offered was when Conaghan wrote "whiz" in a coworker's card then claimed another colleague was copying her when they used "whizz" in a different card.

The Guardian reported she also complained after a coworker asked, "Are you taking the piss, Karen?," a popular British term meaning making fun of someone, after she claimed she was doing "all the hard work."

What a lovely person

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

“Are you taking the piss, Karen?,” a popular British term meaning making fun of someone, after she claimed she was doing “all the hard work.”

In my experience, the people who complain about being the only ones doing all the hard work are the ones doing more complaining than actual working.

  • One would spend several hours almost daily chitchatting at other people's desks about how they are the hardest worker and things can only get done if they do it, they're the first in, last out, etc. But spends half their day complaining instead of working.

  • Another is a serial whiner who says no one else ever does anything, they have to do it all in order to get it done, yet they always have some excuse why they don't have to come in that day, or have to leave early, take a longer lunch, and spends a good chunk of their day gossiping.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 148 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Karen Conaghan sued the…

Ah, there it is

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wow, she is so Karen that her parents even named her that decades ago in the past - that's some dedicated Karening right there! (/s:-D)

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As if she had no say on what her name is whatsoever! I personally always legally change my name whenever weirdos on the internet decide my name has suddenly bad connotations, I am at my 5th name this year and already looking for a new one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago

They're Brits too, guaran-fuckin-teed they called her Cuntyhan behind her back

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 8 points 2 months ago

nominative determinism

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 125 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Retreaux@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wow I heard this one out loud hahaha thank you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 68 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Karen Conaghan

Could we be looking that the origin story of Karen?

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

This feels more like an evolution

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 56 points 2 months ago

Clearly sounds like undiagnosed mental illness. I hope that lady gets some help.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

[off topic?]

My boss's boss was named "Johnson." One day, I accidentally referred to him as "Jackson." None of the people I was talking to corrected me. I decided to try a little experiment and kept on using the wrong name. I used the wrong name dozens and dozens of times and never got called out.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 84 points 2 months ago (14 children)

Because you were silently judged. Behind your back. Always.

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

my inner voice leaking

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

Not her name literally being Karen though

[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

I hope she decided to sue when she ran into one of her former colleagues at the shop who was like "oh yeah Karen, I've got no idea why you didn't receive a card. They're probably harassing you" while trying to exit the conversation as quickly as possible.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

say what you want about America and its ridiculous lawsuit happiness... but I've never seen anyone in America sue over a farewell card they didnt get, presumably because they're the kind of selfinvolved asshole that sues over not getting a goddamn card

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 17 points 2 months ago

I wonder why

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 6 points 2 months ago

Based company it seems.

load more comments
view more: next ›