this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
631 points (98.9% liked)

Gaming

3123 readers
251 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The number of times I've basically seen this exact same thing happen in history is crazy. It'll be something like "Well ole Bill Jesterbong discovered the Gilded Anusbangle in August of 1827 on the island of Nebraska. Naturally, he built a hide in a tall fir tree and camped in it for 3 weeks straight shooting and killing all 1382 Gilded Anusbangles to see if their hide could be useful or if they were tasty. Turns out they were not. The Gilded Anusbangle is now extinct."

[–] LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm struggling to remember the details, but I recall one account where somebody found a very rare, very endangered bird with its nest, strangled the bird and smashed the eggs within the nest, effectively just for shits and giggles. I'll edit and update this if I can find the details.

Edit: The Great Auk. Wasn't killed for shits and giggles, but they were desired for their down to the point the European populations were hunted into extinction. From Wikipedia:

The last pair, found incubating an egg, was killed there on 3 June 1844, on request from a merchant who wanted specimens.[56][c]

Jón Brandsson and Sigurður Ísleifsson, the men who had killed the last birds, were interviewed by great auk specialist John Wolley,[59] and Sigurður described the act as follows:

The rocks were covered with blackbirds [guillemots] and there were the Geirfugles ... They walked slowly. Jón Brandsson crept up with his arms open. The bird that Jón got went into a corner but [mine] was going to the edge of the cliff. It walked like a man ... but moved its feet quickly. [I] caught it close to the edge – a precipice many fathoms deep. Its wings lay close to the sides – not hanging out. I took him by the neck and he flapped his wings. He made no cry. I strangled him.[8]: 82–83 

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was it the Stephens Island Wren?

[–] LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No that's the one made extinct by feral cats, but that's a different episode of Tom Scott's Citation Needed than the one where I learned about the bird I was thinking of. Completely forgot that's where I'd heard about it!

The bird I had in mind is the Great Auk, which was mentioned in a separate episode of Citation Needed lol

From Wikipedia: "The last pair, found incubating an egg, was killed there on 3 June 1844, on request from a merchant who wanted specimens.[56][c]

Jón Brandsson and Sigurður Ísleifsson, the men who had killed the last birds, were interviewed by great auk specialist John Wolley,[59] and Sigurður described the act as follows:

The rocks were covered with blackbirds [guillemots] and there were the Geirfugles ... They walked slowly. Jón Brandsson crept up with his arms open. The bird that Jón got went into a corner but [mine] was going to the edge of the cliff. It walked like a man ... but moved its feet quickly. [I] caught it close to the edge – a precipice many fathoms deep. Its wings lay close to the sides – not hanging out. I took him by the neck and he flapped his wings. He made no cry. I strangled him.[8]: 82–83  
[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Lmao, I knew it was citation needed, just got the wrong bird!

[–] simple@lemm.ee 57 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nothing says "archaeologist" like a pair of handguns to kill everything in your path.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 57 points 1 month ago

But she isn't an archeologist

She is a Tomb Raider

It is literally in the title!

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Combat archaeology should be a thing.

Need to explore an ancient temple that happens to be on ISIS territory? Time to bring in a combat archaeologist.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, once the local militant factions see you as an enemy they start to ramp up destruction of history. There was a similar situation in the 2000s when islamic extremists began destroying tombs in Egypt, likely fueled by an opposition to British political intervention including their support of Israel.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

"Archeology is the study of FACT....not truth. If it's truth you're looking for, Dr. Tyree's philosophy class is right down the hall"

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"gotta kill a hundred natives just to steal their artifact so I can stick it in my trophy room"

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The most recent trilogy is better about that. 2013 has no natives, and Rise and Shadow both have her siding with the natives. Still snags a bunch of artifacts.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

yeah but the original was honest. this cunt was rich as fuck, living in a gigantic mansion. it makes sense that's she's a psycho who hunts natives for sport and exterminates endangered and thought-to-be-extinct animals for trinkets that provide nothing but bragging rights.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It's interesting how much the general attitude has changed about shit like that. In the 90s, I didn't think twice about it, it was just a normal thing to imagine going to some location, killing anything that reacted with hostility to your presence, and taking back whatever you "found" for a vanity display or profit.

My reaction to Indiana Jones' "it belongs in a museum!" was that he was virtue signalling (back before it was even called that). I guess the bright side is that, even as a kid, I thought the idea that museums having some kind of special claim on anything was ridiculous.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Exactly what you would expect from some bored entitled rich kid doing the job for fun.

[–] ExpectedWall@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

You're off the fuckin chain!