this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
160 points (96.5% liked)

Science Memes

10923 readers
2788 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's all about biblatex. I only write using Word/docx if they force me to for publication, otherwise I use LaTeX for typesetting. It's vastly superior for serious publications, especially technical ones.

I use JabRef for managing my citation databases.

[–] IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

Jabref is great. Also, if you need other formats you can always import the bibtex file into Zotero.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Real question, are there any instances of someone's research being so niche that the only option is to cite themselves?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Happens all the time, depends on the paper. Often projects produce a lot of papers about a niche subject, so you're working through building that literature body.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

I did some work In a field with a total of 6 papers over 30 years. It was niche as all get out. Did my second paper cite the first? You betcha. I literally cited every research paper ever done on the topic, including mine.

Now there's 7 papers on the topic.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago
[–] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Recently I've actually been wondering how the hell researchers manage their citations for big projects, because a while back I started doing some research on the Cass Review, tripped on my own dick and accidentally ended up with 70-something disorganized citations (that I actually used) that were a pain in the ass to clean up.

I'm definitely checking out those first three software lol

[–] bobtimus_prime@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I made good experiences with Zotero. Works well with LaTeX, a browser-plugin allows to add papers directly and you can annotate downloaded PDFs. Only problem I had were the paper-metadata, which often needed some fixing. Also that you cannot host your own server is a slight disadvantage.

[–] Phineaz@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

+1 for Zotero and Biblatex. You do need the "Better Bibtex"-Plugin though, or at least I highly recommend it.

"Zotfile" allows you to more or less automatically create a filesystem, so as long as you have a way to sync parts of your drive (or access a server) you can have working links to every paper in your library on any machine.

[–] dunyol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Zotero 7 (the latest main version) broke compatibility with Zotfile, but there are plugins around that are either forks of the version that ran on Zotero 6 or reimplementations of Zotfile’s features.

I personally have been using Zotero Attanger and it’s been working great for me.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Zotero, trust me bruv.