this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
288 points (96.5% liked)
politics
19127 readers
4665 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Huh. I guess it’s not the Jews this time.
Who do You think she meant by "they"?
US Postal Service, actually. How do you think they can promise "Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds."
(Yes, that noise you're hearing in the background is my manic cackle idly daydreaming about conspiracy theorists running with this.)
I mean… what do you think the space lasers are for since they are not being used for Peace™ right now.
/s because it’s sadly necessary
Pretty sure it was a certain subset of democrats she was talking about
But is it the same laser? Are weather controlling space lasers more of a rent and not buy? Or do we have the occasional dueling space lasers of someone didn't make it to the mind virus meeting?
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has sparked a backlash after appearing to suggest that Democrats "can control the weather.
Her tweet was "Democrats control the weather."
She's not suggesting anything.
Wait, instead of blaming the weather on God's wrath for the gays, they're just straight up blaming Democrats now? Have they lost their faith or did they never have it in the first place?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Weather control claims are firmly in the weird category.
“We can change the weather”
Also
“Climate change isn’t real”
Pick a fucking lane lady.
She seems the type to think all the lanes belong to her and fuck you, get out of her way!
wEaThEr IsNt cLiMaTe!1!
if we could actually get them to say this we would be making headway.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Careful, since weather and climate are the same to them, they’ll say the democrats are intentionally heating up the climate so they have an excuse to take away their beloved coal rolling trucks.
well. there are some weather control technologies that actually exist. Like seeding rain for crops. it's fairly common in most places these days.
but there's no way to precipitate a hurricane or stop one.
We could try nuking it.
“About 3 minutes and ding its done!”
And this is the problem with the way she worded it and everyone blowing it off as just weird instead of straight up fucking stupid.
well she didn't mean any of the rain precipitators. She meant, they actively controlled hurricanes. It's both weird and fucking stupid.
Actually. I wonder what would happen if you took a microwave array, of appropriately huge power, and directed it at the hurricane's flanks, you know. to heat up the water on that side. maybe make some wind. I bet you could steer it "some"....
(Mexico, if you're reading this, I absolutely won't try this, if you send me your best street taco recipe.)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Appears!? She literally tweeted, “Yes they can control the weather.”
I read that as in "shows up to say".
No, that’s the Korporate News Kushion for Konservatives
It’s that neutral “both sides” media bullshit- just like you can’t call someone “school shooter”, it’s “alleged school shooter” until the court ruling come down the pipe six months later.
Is this better? Idk.
This idea has been floating around the right for a while. I think it's a way to explain the effects of climate change while blaming the libs.
If they could, Helene would have erased Mar-a-Lago from the map.
While I enjoy the humor, the fact is they'd have aimed it away from landfall.
I mean, if you could control the weather, why not make a Mar-a-Lago sized hurricane?
load more comments
(5 replies)
Democrats see a mentally ill person standing on the corner ranting and raving and shouting insane gibberish, and they think it's sad and we should help that poor person.
Republicans see the same thing and think we should elect that poor person.
So the Democrats control the weather, but humans burning fossil fuels does nothing to the climate
Hilarious that people who don't believe in climate change also believe that the weather can be controlled and targeted at specific communities. And by "hilarious" I mean "makes me want to start hitchhiking to Uruguay".
I thought about that only to realize that the people Uruguay are probably equally as bad and I'm stuck here on this rock with billions of them until someone gives me a ride.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Yeah one of my cousins even mentioned some dude he knows was saying the Dems intentionally shifted the hurricane to clear out the area for lithium mining
If Democrats had thst power I feel we use it to wipe her and Donald Trump along rest of Maga out of this country. I wish we had Xman like Storm. Blow Trump plabe right out of the sky and into the sea.
No kidding. If Dems could do that, Florida would already be underwater.
Was this during their attempt to take over Central City and destroy The Flash? Do they also have a freeze gun, spin like a top, and jump into mirrors?
Very charitable to assume her “they” meant The Democrats and not The Jews.
Or maybe that weird ass HAARP conspiracy from awhile back.
If this is true, we gotta talk Biden into running again. I don't care if he can't talk or stay awake, I'll definitely vote for the weathermancer every time!
The Weathermancer™️.
From Stormy Delaware comes Cloudy Joe and his Lightning Lasers.
They really think we live in Red Alert 2
Newsweek: "appears to say"
She literally wrote: ""Yes they can control the weather,"
Is she confusing Democrats with Drakken from Kim Possible? Secondly, he used that machine to control Canada. So jokes on her.
She truly is from another age. The Ice Age.
Blasphemy
Tbf, the USAF had the tech in the 90s to do this. (Edit: I am not saying the dems did the bad weather thing)
Openly stated in the AF 2025 documents
Weather as force multiplier. Owning the weather in 2025.
https://ia601605.us.archive.org/35/items/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier.pdf
That’s… that’s one of the most terrifying things I’ve ever read, because every page is completely realistic.
Like… holy shit
https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/1296study/
Down the rabbit hole...
Get ready for a hella ride
https://sgp.fas.org/eprint/teleport.pdf
https://spp.fas.org/eprint/98-170.pdf
These people have all the best archives https://fas.org/search/
view more: next ›