David Graeber wrote one of the best summaries: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/david-graeber-are-you-an-anarchist-the-answer-may-surprise-you Each point is easy to communicate, and each one might be enough for an elevator pitch.
Anarchism
Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!
Rules:
- Be respectful
- Don't be a nazi
- Argue about the point and not the person
- This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.
See also:
- /c/debateanarchism
- /c/antiwork
- @lemmy.dbzer0.com
- @slrpnk.net
- Anarchy101
- Anarchism@lemmy.ca
- XMPP chat
One of the first pieces I read, thanks for reminding me!
I could also say inside an elevator: "Anarchism is not chaos. This is capitalist and socialist propaganda. It comes down to mutual aid. People are capable of self-organizing themselves without a boss or any authority."
Anarchy is about living. Its against anything that that stops folks from actually living and thriving. It does so by maximizing peoples autonomy in their lives and by giving them actual self determination. For this we have to look at every part of our lives, our society, our world and scrub it free from domination. TBH just what crimethinc says in To Change Everything - an anarchist appeal lol
You are right that developing and practicing a script is a good idea! If you can practice with a comrade that is even better and may also help with anxiety.
Generally speaking, I would recommend having a clear objective of what you want people to do when they read your zine and have a conversation with you. For example, maybe you are hosting a reading group or mutual aid action and want people to join. In addition to being good organizing, this can also help your conversations because you will have that goal in mind: (1) is this someone you want to attend that event and if so, (2) how will you convince them to join?
I'll also mention some elements of a good organizing conversation. This isn't exhaustive but I hope it is helpful. An introduction is facilitated by a friendly question like, "have you heard about [this upcoming event]?" or, "Hi! Could I talk to you for 3 minutes about this upcoming [X]?" A smile and greeting, almost as if you already know them, is very effective at getting past the "oh no another rando talking to me" barrier. Then have your single-sentence pitch for why it is important to go t o this event and how valuable it would be for them to attend. If you can ask an open ended question about the topic before this, even better, but if you think they may not stand around very long go straight to the pitch. Importantly, have a direct ask and make it multiple times if they don't say yes the first time. Direct asks are very powerful. They are the difference between a canvasser bringing in $0/day vs. $1000/day when doing a donation drive.
I also recommend avoiding terms that have specific meanings within your political groups but may not be understood by the general public. These are things people will learn if they come to your event or read your zone, but they will only think, "what were they talking about!?" if you use them during a first conversation. Order without authority and hierarchy are those kinds of terms. Instead think of how you would explain those concepts to sell someone on their validity and relevance to everyone's lives, then use those more accessible explanatory terms instead. Why should someone care about unjust hierarchy and domination? Are there any salient issues you are organizing around that are about these things? Tie them together! "How Israel leverages unjust hierarchy to oppress Palestinians", that kind of thing.
I just tell them they are bootlickers
That's a good conversation opener for sure