I asked ChatGPT a question. Now I’m powered by AI.
this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
94 points (92.7% liked)
Technology
59284 readers
4276 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I have a better AI model. I ask it where the start the fire will start, then I go there to start the fire myself.
Controlled burns are unironically based and a good way to cut down on old biomass that can cause these huge uncontrollable wildfires
I feel like they have to put “AI” (the word, not the meaning of it) everywhere. It’s just the new buzzword, we still have to see some positive effects of AI. It just seems they have to throw it out because it’s the new thing.
Uh I mean, statistical machine learning models are used in tons of places and have been for a while now. There's plenty of positive effects to be had. It's just called "AI" without further clarification.
I'm sure what they are doing here is developing one such machine learning model to improve their detection.
And to me it seems like wildfire detection is a good contender to be improved by machine learning.
Sure, it is good in this regard Still it seems like the term “AI” is being thrown around way too much
that's some minority report shit
Not really - it isn’t prediction, it is early detection. Interpretive AI (finding and interpreting patterns) is way ahead of generative AI.