this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
619 points (99.0% liked)

Greentext

3997 readers
2004 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BobbyGasoline@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dditty@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

Lol classic

[–] xep@fedia.io 32 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Anon could've bought an electronic air duster and had a clean PC for years! But good on you, anon. Cleaning out your PC is important.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, bit more expensive up front but pays for itself and performance doesn't massively downgrade as the can cools down, and is stronger anyway

[–] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Stronger? Which one? I bought one for 30 bucks and it was extremely loud and had less blowing power than the can. As I buy 1 can every 5 years or so, I returned the electric one.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

I have a micro inflatable mattress fan that I use to clean my keyboard. It has attachments and one of them is just a tiny small pin hole, I think it's meant for inflatable water donuts or something. Works wonders.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I use this one and it is definitely much stronger (and louder) than any can of air I've ever used. Stronger as in more volume AND velocity.

On a hot day it literally cools my entire body down.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 77 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

They check ID for compressed air? Where is this?

Now something like 99.99% alcohol electronics cleaner I would understand because people use it to cut meth or some other wild shit.

[–] MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works 77 points 20 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Dave2@lemmy.blahaj.zone 79 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Causes instant death but also addiction? They resurrect me and I immediately go for another can of air duster.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

*not always all at once

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 2 points 4 hours ago

Totally guessing but im sure its similar to people saying "Try coke once and you could die!". Technically true, if your coke is laced with Fent. Maybe get too high of a concentration in your air duster and you simply die?

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

I guess being dead was just better.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 13 hours ago

High so addictive not even death results in ingervention

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 60 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Is it maybe an US-exclusive thing? Due to less stricter regulations maybe? I'm from Europe and no compressed air was 18+ or had warning signs like "causes instant death"

I'm in the US and haven't bought compressed air recently, but I definitely didn't need to present ID the last time I did.

This article says 38 states have age restrictions, but after a brief search, I couldn't find any evidence for this in my state (Utah). It's illegal to use it to get high and to sell it to someone with the understanding that they'll use it to get high. But now I'm curious, I'll have to ask the next time I'm at a store that sells it.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 21 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Probably because you can buy beer at 16, so no one is trying to get high on office supplies.

[–] Sparky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Not Europe but here in Norway I do see people huffing nitrous oxide. We do have a legal drinking age of 18 tho

[–] superkret@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

And a beer at the supermarket costs the equivalent of $18.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 10 points 14 hours ago

Nitrous is not comparable to air dusters

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

A DuPont study tried HFC-152a and HFC-134a on rats, dogs, and humans for time periods of up to three months with a followup examination 2 years with no adverse effects. LINK

I'm sure this has nothing to do with the USA'S proposed ban DFE last month despite it functioning as a zero-potential for ozone-depletions alternative to CFCs.

That red line you drew could just be explained by market availability of the new Aerosol that convienently excludes the CFC equivalents which existed before and were banned.

[–] Yokozuna@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Anon is on the path to finding out why it's like that and trying it out for themselves.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Breaking into buildings by triggering their REX-sensors?

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 1 points 35 minutes ago

Maybe I shouldn't ask but how do you trigger an exit button from the outside with a can of compressed air ?