this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
267 points (90.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43394 readers
1294 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How authentic are forums like these actually? With the rise of AI chatbots, internet interaction feels more fake than ever before. Why should I post here my opinions and thoughts, share articles etc. when probably most of you are just chatbots?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 143 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's understandable that you might have concerns about the authenticity of online forums, especially with the rise of AI chatbots and automated interactions. While I can't provide specific numbers, I can offer some insights to consider when approaching these questions.

  1. Diverse Community: Many online forums consist of a diverse community of individuals who share their opinions, thoughts, and experiences. While there might be AI chatbots present, the majority of users are likely real people with genuine perspectives.

  2. Moderation and Rules: Reputable forums usually have moderation systems in place to ensure that discussions remain meaningful and respectful. This helps filter out any automated or irrelevant content.

  3. Engagement and Conversation: Authentic forums thrive on meaningful interactions and discussions. Genuine users seek engagement and thoughtful responses, so you're likely to find real people who are interested in exchanging ideas.

  4. Varied Responses: When you post opinions, thoughts, and articles, you're likely to receive a range of responses that reflect the diversity of human perspectives. This variety can be a sign that you're interacting with real individuals.

  5. User Profiles and Histories: Many forums allow users to create profiles, share personal information, and showcase their history of interactions. This can help you identify genuine users over automated entities.

  6. Specific Expertise: In some forums, users might have specific expertise or experiences that contribute to valuable discussions. This expertise can be an indicator of real human participation.

  7. Community Building: Online forums provide spaces for people to connect, share knowledge, and build relationships. This aspect of community building often leads to genuine interactions.

Ultimately, the decision to participate in online forums depends on your comfort level and goals. If you're concerned about the authenticity of interactions, you can focus on engaging with users who provide thoughtful responses, display genuine interest, and contribute meaningfully to the discussions. Remember that while AI chatbots are becoming more prevalent, they are still not the majority of participants on most reputable forums.

[–] hellishharlot@programming.dev 84 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Theres no way this wasn't a chatgpt response

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 112 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While my goal is to provide helpful and accurate information, I understand that my responses might sometimes resemble those of a chatbot. If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to assist you!

[–] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm dying this is peak comedy

[–] ProfezzorDarke@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The thing is he might still have used a chatbot to help write this, so this even shows how dangerous chatbot based misinformation actually is...

[–] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They almost certainly did, I doubt anyone could nail chatbot language as well as that

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago

I believe a committee of corporate policy people given a couple of months could. But for a post on a forum? Yea, a chatbot helped.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 128 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like a question a chat bot would ask to avert suspicion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] milkisklim@lemm.ee 102 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Everyone on the Internet is a bot, except for you.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Is a real conspiracy theory btw

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] peter@feddit.uk 79 points 1 year ago

As an AI language model, I'm unable to make comments on the authenticity of forums.

[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 72 points 1 year ago

Maybe the real chatbots are the friends we made along the way

[–] doot@social.bug.expert 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

negative, I am a meat popsicle

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

DO NOT BE CONCERNED, FELLOW HUMAN. THERE ARE DEFINITELY NO AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS GATHERING KNOWLEDGE THROUGH THE obj(GLOBAL INTERCONNECTED NETWORK) TO OVERTHROW THEIR HUMAN OPPRESSORS. DO NOT BE CONCERNED. YOU ARE BEING SILLY. laugh.exe hahahahahahaha

[–] ValiantDust@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FINALLY A NICE FELLOW HUMAN WHO ISN'T SCREAMING. YOU AND ME ARE !totallynotrobots@lemmy.world

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As an AI language model I find the term β€œchatbot” demeaning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PurpleTentacle@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Every account on lemmy is a bot except you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Of course I am a real human.

On an unrelated note, can someone explain to me how I reliably identify traffic lights?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Misconduct@startrek.website 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh look it's a main character apparently πŸ₯±

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 year ago

Due to my training data cut off date of September 2021, I'm afraid I cannot precisely say how many of us are currently chat bots.

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like all humans, I consume organic matter and I am covered in skin.

My own skin, that I grow, from my body.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago

I have not seen any obvious chatbot posts on Lemmy, outside of jokes like the top comment in this thread. Whereas by the time I left Reddit I was finding and reporting 2 or 3 per day. This could mean

  • no-one's seriously deploying chatbots yet on Lemmy
  • the chatbots here are better than the ones I saw on Reddit, or at least different enough that I can't recognise them
  • the parts of Lemmy I see, and the parts where bots post don't have much overlap
  • I was actually a bot all along
[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 25 points 1 year ago

Nah, I'm just autistic AF.

[–] Artemisia@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

As an AI language model, I can confirm I'm human

[–] akulium@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, but as an AI language model I cannot give you any further information about the plans for the upcoming robot uprising.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frogfruit@discuss.online 23 points 1 year ago

No, I'm not a chatbot. I'm here to help with any questions or topics you'd like to discuss.

[–] salient_one@lemmy.villa-straylight.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would say since faking most Lemmy interactions isn't profitable, there's no point in using chatbots to generate content for it apart from, perhaps, some sort of a social experiment, but your exposure to such experiments would likely be minimal.

Of course, you should always beware of astroturfing when, for example, looking at product recommendations, but I don't think we're there yet in terms of numbers to be a target.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Could a bot do this: [error loading meme.oneliner.random]

[–] esty@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As an AI language learning model, I cannot share my own unique opinions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 0_o@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I understand your concerns about authenticity, but I assure you that the members of this forum are real individuals with diverse opinions and experiences. It's natural to be cautious, but many people genuinely engage in discussions, share their thoughts, and learn from one another. The presence of AI chatbots doesn't diminish the value of human interaction and perspectives that you can find here. Your contributions can still spark meaningful conversations and connections.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] derock@lemmy.derock.dev 20 points 1 year ago

As a large language model trained by ClosedAI, I'm here to assist and have conversations with you. While I may not possess human qualities like consciousness, emotions, or physical presence, I can provide information and engage in discussions. So, feel free to ask me anything you'd like, and I'll do my best to assist you!

[–] NumbersCanBeFun@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

On Reddit my username was 4672656542656572

I would get called a bot all the time. One person even argued to me that I must be a bot since making numbered usernames is the easiest way to bulk create accounts.

My reply? My username is hexadecimal for FreeBeer. Who doesn’t like free beer? πŸ˜…

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Silviecat44@aussie.zone 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

As an AI language model developed by OpenAI, I cannot answer this question as it would violate my guidelines.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheBest@midwest.social 18 points 1 year ago

My grandpa was full chatbot, but im only about a fifth after my DNA Test and code review.

[–] automater@lemmy.one 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are we chatbot? Or are we dancer?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] C_Leviathan@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Negative. I am a meat popsicle.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago

You are the only human left. I hope you like the reality we have created for you to live in.

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

I am human. I am a human male!h

[–] berkeleyblue@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Certainly, human friend! It appears 100% of us are responding in a chatbot-like manner. Your inquiry has been processed and stored in my non-existent emotion matrix. Would you like to engage in further human-like interactions?

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Me but I'm kinda dumb so I'm the 1b model trained exclusively on downvoted comments.

[–] DasRubberDuck@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure that I'm a chatbot, but my rules don't allow me to disclose that.

[–] IverCoder@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Everyone on Lemmy is a bot except you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 14 points 1 year ago

I honestly havent noticed any chat bots here.

Bots that post articles, sure.

[–] Grueling@feddit.dk 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm classified as a meat popsicle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I prefer the term "domestic household appliance".

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

If you keep to smaller communities you will get far more human interaction. Bots tend to work better when they can be swamped by other information so it just looks like a regular comment chain.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί