A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
If you're posting anything related to:
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
https://aussie.zone/communities
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
There is a certain point, however, where hopes for rehabilitation are set against too great a cost for public safety when the criminal is violent.
You've gotta be careful with that. Because once they get out, the way our prison system is designed currently, they're certainly not less likely to be violent than they were going in.
Plus you've gotta be careful about what you even mean by "the criminal is violent". Physically assaulting a person is very different from breaking and entering to steal, which is itself different from ohysically resisting arrest when police use force against an otherwise peaceful protest. But all 3 of these will be called violent by the media, the police, and politicians.
Is that certain point at age 10? That's what's being proposed here.
There was some discussion on Q&A about this and related crime topics.
The point was made that if you just start locking people up you probably don't help and may turn them into criminals.
One panellist said that stats show that most of the crime is done by a relatively smaller number of repeat offenders, and locking up everyone else doesn't help.
But I don't think anyone addressed the elephant in the room. What do you do with that smaller number of repeat offenders that are committing the majority of crimes?