this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
689 points (83.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26652 readers
4196 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 99 points 2 months ago (28 children)

"Know" is a stretch. Plants respond to attack by releasing chemicals (e.g. nettles and grasses), curling or retracting their leaves (e.g. acacia), or by changing their morphology (e.g. holly); but they have no nervous system - let alone a brain - so it's not like you're killing an animal.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 105 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Plants having no nervous system is being challenged with the idea that the plant itself is its central nervous system.

They react to stimulus, they emit sounds (different ones when in “pain”), and communicate with each other.

They don’t have consciousness in a way we understand

I dont mean this as a “dunk” but more of a how neat is that

[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 40 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (19 children)

It's always funny to me how people eat up the concept of a distrubuted neural network in tech but scoff at the same idea applying to something like a tree or a fungus.

Pando is the largest organism by area, and the Humungous Fungus is the largest by mass. The idea that those organisms don't "think" in some way is laughable.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"In some way" is doing A LOT of heavy lifting there. ... although in the general sense, agreed.

Especially given how many outright wrong or otherwise assinine conclusions some "thinking" animals come to... Perhaps communicative consciousness is overrated on the intelligence scale.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (17 children)

We don't know how consciousness works enough to say they don't. Having a brain and/or nervous system might not be necessary.

They don't have muscles either, but some plants are known to uproot themselves and fucking move.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 74 points 2 months ago

Lemmyworld admins be like

[–] superkret@feddit.org 51 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Carnivores eat animals that eat a lot more plants than humans could ever eat.

That's why I only eat baby animals. They only drink milk, which hurts no one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 45 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Let's assume for a moment that somehow your salad was conscious. That's an even bigger reason not to eat an animal that has to be fed on plants for a long time.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Or maybe its just a fundamental fact of life that something has to die in order for you to live and virtue signaling about the degree to which you participate in that death is a pointless exercise.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Ah yes, the old "I accidentally stepped on a fly, might as well exterminate the whole biosphere" defense

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

"our new cancer drug is 99% effective!"

"So it doesn't work in 1% of cases? Then what's the point, throw it away, we just have to accept that cancer is going to happen"

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago

This logic doesn't make sense in any other context. Like, if I say we should try to reduce CO2 levels in the atmosphere, you could point out that emitting CO2 is a fundamental part of human life, so something something virtue signaling blah blah blah. Just because something is unavoidable to a certain degree doesn't mean we shouldn't try to minimize it.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Or maybe there's happy middle where everyone can live comfortably while keeping the harm we cause at a minimum.

Or, at the most selfish, we could make sure we don't kill ourselves this decade or the next.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Chev@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago (13 children)

Everybody needs to eat stuff. And if it is about reducing pain and having a better climate impact, you should plants all the way. A cow eats 50 times the amount of plants that it gives back in meat.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 2 months ago (38 children)

hey vegans, cool fact, plant based diets are vastly more efficient and effective at feeding people than meat based diets.

Meat consumes plants to exist, most of that energy is lost. Not so much with plants.

Just start telling people this shit lmao. Who cares about morality when you can pretend to be saving the environment instead.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (21 children)

I'm no vegan but that's a common vegan talking point

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You think they don't? And environmentalism is also morality.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Soulcreator@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Hey non-vegan, fun fact: No one really cares when you tell them eating plants are more efficient.

Common responses include "bAc0Nnnnnn!" and "I'm gonna eat two times the amount of meat to make your efforts useless".

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)

There's a type of person that thinks Joe Rogan is clever because they agree with him.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 months ago (11 children)

"Plants rights activists" out in full force in this thread lol

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago

it's not that they want to reduce plant suffering. it's that they don't care if plants suffer.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's no way this won't restart the same argument with someone, huh? Top-tier shitpost, well done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That's why I only eat fungi. It'll be reciprocal eventually.

[–] heydo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Fun fact, humans share more DNA with fungi than they do with plants. We share nearly 50% of our DNA with fungi.

Plus mushrooms are the sex organs of the mycelium organism. Just an extra fun fact for free there.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

I mean if you stretch the definition enough even cells know they are being eaten. they usually respond by "shit this cant be good, I better press this big red button"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There was a Hungarian cult that convinced others that people can survive by eating light. There were some deaths and was quickly shut down, but they exist forever in anorexia-related jokes.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago

I think you're talking about Breatherism? There've been a couple of those cults all over Europe. It's not particularly popular, luckily, but they often make it to the newspapers, because someone usually dies.

It originates from Hinduism though. There's a another Indian religion called Jainism. These are the monks you see brushing away the beetles before their feet, to not step on them. It's very much about nature and spiritualism and being good. Fasting is a key concept of this religion and the most extreme cases will choose to fast until death to cleanse the world. This is all very spiritual though and takes years of preparation.

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yo fuck that propagandist piece of shit Joe Rogan. Keep him off of my feed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Banichan@dormi.zone 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Those poor cats. Vegans shouldn't be allowed to own meat.

[–] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Dogs taste better anyways. Can’t beat a good Elwood’s steak!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (10 children)

I am mostly vegan and my cat and dog eat mostly meat 🖕

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nurgus@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Ew, Joe Rogan.

[–] aniki@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 months ago

Do y'all not eat vegetables too?

[–] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago

Joe Rogan 🤮

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 13 points 2 months ago

Their fault for dressing so sexy

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

That's not how knowledge works.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

Finally we have one thing to pin on like 3 weird vegans.

load more comments
view more: next ›