this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

New York Times gift articles

547 readers
196 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Rad. Keep voting for free market, deregulation policies. What's the worst that could happen to your land and livelihood?

[–] Clent@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hard to have any sympathy for anyone when the problem is one caused by their own voting choices when an alternative exist and they refuse it.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Feels good to blame victims at a distance, doesn’t it

[–] Clent@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They aren't victims. That's my point.

I'm sure it fells good for you to feel that they are and that you're out there defending them.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don’t know any American farmers, but I suspect they have limited options of who to vote for, and even when they diligently vote correctly at every opportunity, their candidates are incentivized to betray them the moment they take office. The more important truth, however, is this:

When some misfortune befalls your fellow man, this instinct to bury pity with contempt hurts you more than it hurts them.

[–] StarshotJohn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I live around a ton of farmers. They all vote the same.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Still I’m inclined to feel for them, the way I felt for people in the UK during Brexit, Canadians when their labor rights are eroded, Russians when their government rigs their elections and media, Chinese when their government persecutes them, and so forth.

I suspect it’s often not a majority of citizens pushing through these harmful policies. Even when it is, I blame lack of education and larger hostile actors who wage war against the masses with misinformation campaigns, election interference, etc.

The point is not that people themselves are entirely free of blame. It’s that human suffering always merits sympathy, and looking for reasons to disregard or rejoice in their just desserts isn’t a helpful impulse.

[–] StarshotJohn@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago
[–] Clent@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lack of sympathy is not a form of contempt. Lack of sympathy is form of apathy. Contempt cannot exist where there is apathy.

Your ignorance and suspicions are yours alone and do not transferable to me.

It's silly and weird for you to make up this story in your head about me and then attack that imagined person.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

problem is one caused by their own voting choices

Blame. Contempt. Not attacking. Showing you your self.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Holding someone accountable for their choices isn't blaming them nor is it attacking them.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago
[–] deuleb_biezelbob@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

Spongebob was right, in the future everything is ~~chrome~~ plastic