this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
183 points (97.9% liked)

Movies

7210 readers
585 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 42 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

As an out of work union filmmaker, unless you want the film industry to die, please don’t pay for this. It encourages studios to stop making new content, simply rereleasing their old content. The film industry is hanging on by a thread as it is right now. Many of us are going to leave to start new careers FAR too late in life to be taken seriously.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I understand your point, but for most of the year more than half of every cinema screens are showing marvel/disney trash that even your average movie goer is sick of. Going to one of two screenings of an old, actually good movie isn't going to make or break the industry.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do what you want, brother.

The industry is broken. The marvel shit and allowing the studio heads to deeply involve themselves in the creative process through nepotism and ego are what brought us here.

They don’t even care if the content is good anymore. They have insurance. I worked on Madame Webb and got the sense that they knew it was going to bomb. They have stockpiles of the good stuff to fall back on if they get desperate for money.

The Matrix was made in a time that will never happen again.

Anyway, it is my opinion that going to see this movie actively encourages the film industry to continue their fall into mediocrity unchecked. If one dislikes the super hero shit, don’t go see anything until they put out a new movie. Thats just my advice. Again. Do whatever you want…

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I worked on Madame Webb

Would you mind doing an AMA?

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry. I don’t want to dox myself even further.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Understood.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I haven't paid for movies in about 6 years now. Literally nothing of interest. I have basically banned all forms of corpo media as a result of their lazyness and garbage. I'm doing my part

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think you really grasped his point.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Probably not, I'm pretty stupid at times

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Honestly you’re doing more good than harm. The content they put out lately (they make people pay and STILL make them watch ads!) isn’t good enough to deserve our money. The way that they fragmented the content into walled gardens, again, deserves to have us vote with our wallets until they can offer something less rent-seeking.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

When streaming began, I was screaming from the rooftops that we should take the failure of the music industry as a cautionary tale against streaming services. My solution was a decentralized streaming platform that charges users a monthly fee and pays content creators fairly by dividing total viewing time per month.

Since those greedy assholes couldn’t be bothered to listen and have instead moved to the subscription model, competing with massive warchests of licensed-content rather than making any new content, I say fuck em. Pirate it if you will. Netflix and the 500 other walled-gardens have fragmented their own content into irrelevancy.

I say we let the content compete on the open market instead of forcing users to make allegiances with a handful of gatekeepers.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ummm... Netflix is producing massive quantities of new content.

It might not all be good, it might be repetitive or you might not like it, but it's a lot.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 11 points 2 weeks ago

Not a single production is working right now. Ask me how I know. I worked on a few Netflix productions in the past year or two. One will be released soon.

What Netflix et all are shooting right now is MAYBE like 6 productions across the entirety of the world. They were ALL waiting for the new contracts before they greenlit projects. It has been like that for a few years now.

It used to be that LA and NYC would be working non stop. No one is working right now.

[–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm just here to say I appreciate your insight.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 11 points 2 weeks ago

No problem. Thanks for your compassion. My colleagues and I sincerely appreciate it.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Funny how people say this, then the moment an original movie comes out they ignore or shit on it. Disney is an example, their last 4 or 5 original animated movies have flopped, meanwhile sequels are raking in the cash. It's no wonder studios go that way. People shit all over Disney's original releases this past year.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think you’re conflating two different parties of people. I LOVE good content. There hasn’t been much good content released in a decade.
Did you see Free Guy? That wasn’t bad at all.

Dune was pretty good. They seemed to get out of Villanueve’s way to let him tell the story how he saw fit. They were a rare, well-made, nearly unanimously agreed-upon good series of movies.

IMO, it’s Disney funding nepotism in that case. Rather than hiring a creative genius (like a David Fincher or Alfonso Cuaron), they prefer to consider someone that ticks their identity politics focus group numbers BEFORE they think about that director’s talent.

If they hired talented directors rather than their buddies and gave them the freedom of CREATIVE CONTROL (like they would give someone like Spielberg or another auteur) they might be shocked at how much better the content is. But the reality is: the studios make nepotistic hires above the line and, at every single turn, micromanage, withhold funding, and focus-group the production into a stiff, lifeless PC representation of their corporate identity. Marvel/Disney and Netflix are ESPECIALLY guilty of this. Seen that one with Gal Gadot, Ryan Reynolds, and The Rock? What the fuck was that? It was like a whole movie of stupid cameos and dumbass plot twists/plot holes. It felt like it was written by a studio head.

Controversy is actively avoided…and controversy/doing unconventional things is the LIFEBLOOD of good content.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

My kids are 11 and 9 and have no idea what the Matrix is. I feel like this is targeted at me.

It might be a little too violent for the 9 year old. Especially the deaths of Switch, Apoc, and Mouse. "Not like this" his hard.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 44 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, your kids can't be told what the Matrix is. They have to see it for themselves.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

Leaps off a tall building

[–] proudblond@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We have 8 and 10 and we have just been thinking that maybe the 10 year old could handle it. Sadly the 8 year old is really sensitive so no time soon.

[–] rezz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

10 years old is entirely too young for this film. Mature 13-14 year old is definitely the earliest anyone should watch this.

[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I hate my local theater because they never participate in this stuff but they're still playing Twisters which has been available on VOD for weeks now.

Edit

For the record I'm not knocking the quality of Twisters. I thought it was a pretty good summer blockbuster. I'm more knocking the quality of my theaters programming choices, playing movies to empty rooms while never doing special events.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Man, that movie sucked so hard. It was extremely disappointing.

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I really enjoyed it, saw it twice. was a classic summer blockbuster with good actors and the CGI for the storms was insane and really well done

[–] Maven@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It was significantly better than the original film at the very least. Both of them were stupid but at least the new one didn't make me hate the main character the whole time.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

At least the original had groundbreaking VFX at the time.

The new one looks great but it's nothing new. I enjoyed it for the popcorn disaster movie it is and we can do much, much worst with those (looking a you Roland Emmerich you hack).

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly, if wasn't even good as a blockbuster disaster movie.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago

Lol .... with coming climate change, we won't need VFX ... we'll just tune into the local evening news in the future.

Everyone will get bored with make believe movies because real life will look so much more epically disastrous.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca -3 points 2 weeks ago

It's a good thing that they aren't trying to cash grab you

[–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

I just got The Art of the Matrix in the mail the other day. I was/still am obsessed with this movie/series.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Maybe. But at least they're milking a very good cow this time rather than an inbred goat (another sequel).

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Another? Was there more than one film?

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hypothetically, of course!

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

True. The latest one was absolutely awful

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 weeks ago

Well, they already did that not too long ago. So seeing them do this is more like "well, the sequel didn't work, what else can we do to milk this even more?"

Is there a plan to show all of them in this anniversary? Because the first one on its own is not quite enough, I feel. It opens the story of the movies that follow.

[–] TastyWheat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Great movie. Wonder if they'll make a sequel someday.