this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
27 points (96.6% liked)

Casual UK

2172 readers
34 users here now

Casual UK

A casual place for banter and anything that doesn't fit in anywhere else.

Have chat and a natter. Talk about anything and everything.

Keep it casual.

Rules

Other communities:

Here:

Elsewhere:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Terry’s Chocolate Orange have tried to switch things up by bringing out a new flavour of their iconic citrus-shaped snack, but a lot of fans aren’t having any of it.

...

Its quality and deliciousness has remained tried and trusted throughout the years, but that hasn’t stopped Carambarco – the manufacturer behind the brand – from experimenting with different flavours and concepts.

...

Then, in 2023, Terry’s went beyond the original orange flavour for the first time ever, bringing out the Terry’s Chocolate Mint ball.

...

This week, however, shoppers have been left outraged after a new variation appeared in B&M stores across the country.

Introducing the Terry’s ‘Chocolate Milk’ without the orange.

Naturally, fans of the cult classic treat were outraged – and many were left wondering whether there was any point in it without the key ingredient.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 26 points 2 months ago

Literally just finished national rioting

[–] Firebirdie713@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If they had any sense, they would release a chocolate orange that doesn't have milk ingredients. Too many people can't have milk due to intolerance and allergies nowadays, and I miss being able to enjoy chocolate oranges around Christmas.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

recently became lactose intolerant (and less recently became disgusted with the dairy industry in my country) so I too would be excited about non dairy chocolate oranges

(though heavy metal contamination of many cocoa brands scares me too...)

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The alternative to dairy milk is either a different milk like goat milk (which is why American chocolate tastes the way it does) or some emulsified oil like palm oil. Neither are great and would make a noticeably poorer chocolate.

[–] Firebirdie713@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Not necessarily. I have had plenty of very good chocolate that uses cocoa butter and/or plant milks like oat milk in place of dairy. Or they could make their dark chocolate orange without milk with little to no difference in taste and texture.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

What do all the vegan chocolate brands use? I assumed oat, but now I realise I may be wrong.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Outraged fans

The original flavour is still available and no one is forcing you to eat the new one, so...

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Don't worry, no one is actually outraged.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah no one cares. It just seems like a bit of a pointless product but I guarantee literally no one cared.

Also it's only available in B&M stores and in the place like that you'll just be happy that you got a named brand product, and not some cheap knockoff brand.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'd be all for a dark chocolate chilli bomb.

[–] wren@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

they did a chocolate lemon decades ago, but it was with dark chocolate, wasn't popular & got discontinued. I think they should try again but with white chocolate

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah white chocolate and lemon would make way more sense. Or white chocolate and raspberry.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Now you are talking! This sounds... inspid.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Someone get Terry on the blower! We need this ASAP!

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

Preach!

Who's got Tel's number?

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago

Did they make it smaller and more expensive again at the same time?

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago

What is happening to the world? Honestly why do I even live?

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago
[–] Quicky@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Remember when a chocolate orange didn’t have fucking hollowed-out concave segments? I do Terry, you greedy prick.

[–] Todd_cross@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This isn't the first time they had a non-orange ball. I remember raspberry flavored ones in the early 2000s and Wikipedia has a whole list of flavors, unless I'm not understanding what they meant.

EDIT: This was also in the USA. I didn't realize what instance I was on. I don't know what you had.

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

if its not broken don't fix it

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I would be happy with a fruit and nut one.

The issue with cadburys fruit and nut bars is that the individual squares are so small that they're practically all a piece of fruit or a piece of nut and very little chocolate (biggest first world problem ever). Seems like the chocolate orange slices would be large enough to fix this problem.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Just eat a satsuma with slightly cooled pieces of cadburys twirl (the separate pieces in a bag, not a bar). Vastly superior imho....

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

I call publicity stunt

[–] rubikcuber@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They're always doing this pish. I once accidentally bought one that had popping candy in it and it was boke.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago

I love finding all the weird experimental stuff in Home Bargains, like the Jaws and Back To The Future cereal (Jaws is sea-creature shapes rather than human limbs, sadly).