this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
135 points (99.3% liked)

World News

38978 readers
3652 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser wants to further restrict the carrying of knives in public, to combat a perceived rise in knife crime. The opposition has criticized the plan as impractical.

The German government has promised tougher knife laws after the police reported a rise in the number of stabbings, especially near train stations — though the statistics remain controversial.

Interior Minister Nancy Faeser has called for the law to be changed so that only blades of 6 centimeters (2.36 inches) would be allowed to be carried in public, rather than the current 12 centimeters. An exception would be made for household knives in their original packaging. Switchblades would be banned altogether.

The government pronouncement came after police statistics recorded a 5.6% year-on-year rise in cases of serious bodily harm involving a knife, with 8,951 incidents in 2023. The federal police, which is responsible for safety at Germany's airports and major railway stations, also reported a significant increase in knife attacks in and around stations, with 430 in the first six months of this year.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nicerdicer@feddit.org 48 points 2 months ago (10 children)

This is a futile attempt to establish safety, and it is done so that it can be claimed that something has been done.

If some person has the intention to do any harm to others, this person would not be stopped by any restriction to carry any weapon.

The real issues lay much deeper: A growing number of refugees and asylum seekers that want to work, but are prohibited to do so, but at the same time these are competing in an already tight housing market. Raising costs of living, growing inequality, growing envy and a part of the population which is on the brink of shiftig into a nazi movement, with a growing resentment to foreign people. It takes more than putting up a sign that says that weapons are forbidden beyond this point to solve these problems.

Also, in Germany there is no reason ever to walk around with waepons. Compared to other parts of the world it is pretty safe here.

Putting up a sign that states that weapon are forbidden would have the same impact as putting up a sign that forbids wild fires in the forest or flooding near a body of water.

[–] brrt@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I don’t understand. No law prevents anyone from doing what’s forbidden. Are you saying all laws are futile? Otherwise what is different with this law that makes it futile?

Also, we usually can do many things at once or in succession. We can raise prices on sugary food, start programs to inform the public about the impact sugar has on health, make school lunches more healthy etc. Would you complain that it is futile raising prices if it was the first thing proposed or would you say “Good, let’s do this and also the other things.”?

[–] nicerdicer@feddit.org 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Are you saying all laws are futile? Otherwise what is different with this law that makes it futile?

I do not say that all laws are futile. The difference with this particular measurement is that it is odd to me, that a no-weapon zone is being established, as it is quite unusual that Germans carry around weapons in general. At least not where I live. People carrying around weapons of any kind is just not a thing here.

There are other laws, speed restrictions for instance. I get that there is a necessity to enforce such thing, as people have cars and tend to drive faster than they should. Speeding with a car is more common than carrying a weapon. That's why this law makes sense, as it adresses the issue right there. Speeding doesn't have an underlying issue that causes drivers to speed.

The thing what makes it futile in my opinion is that a restriction in carrying weapons does not solve the underlying issues (the root causes of socio-economic inequality, among others) that probably lead to harming others with knives. It's just treating the symptoms, not the root cause.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] killingspark@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

The problem with this specific law is that it isn't practically enforceable. You'd need to regularly search people entering this zone, which we will certainly not do.

Law's only matter if you can expect them to be enforced. Raising prices is easily enforced (because it would be done via taxes which are checked for correctness already).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago (21 children)

Yeah. You ban knives, people will switch to axes, machetes, bats, pipes, chains, brass knuckles, and so on. I've been saying this for a long time about the US as well. You can ban guns in the US and you'll just end up with knife crime like this. You need to actually address the root causes of socioeconomic inequality that actually drives crime (and lack of mental health care too).

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I think I'd take knife crime over mass shootings.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (12 children)

in denmark that law worked wonders and was later expanded so you are not allowed to have a screw driver on you if you are not needing it for some work. so at party disctricts or railstations no one can have stuff that can be used for stabbing.

whats the worst this law can do? a few less assholes with weapons.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

Japan has very similar laws under the sword and firearms act that prevents most knives and some other "dangerous" objects from being carried without cause and even then there are typically rules about how it must be transported/stored when in public (such as the train). It seems to mostly work here. Usually, the ones who do attack others are those whom were failed by the healthcare system here (specifically, the way Japan (often fails) to deal with mental health issues).

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

My state (US) finally just got rid of the law against switch blades/automatics. Mainly because it became a defunct/useless law that was made back when other knives were hard to open or took two hands to open. But in today's world of flippers and spydercos and spring assist and all of those that are every bit as quick and easy to open, banning an otf or switch blade just didn't make any sense.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

It was also from back in the "juvenile delinquency" horror of the 1950s when they decided that switchblades were for delinquents to have knife fights with after reading those evil comic books.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Wait… you have laws against knifes and assault rifles at walmart?

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I believe that all states have now repealed their bans on owning gravity knives, switchblades, and butterfly knives. However, carrying them in public--depending on blade length, may still be illegal. Some states only prohibit them from being carried if you intend to use them in a crime, and actually using them in a crime is used to prove intent; i.e., it just ends up being an additional charge.

Modern sporting rifles--AKA assault style rifles--are usually not okay to carry openly in the same states that used to ban certain types of knives.

Where I live, someone that openly carries a belt knife is taken as prima facie evidence that they've been permanently prohibited from owning a firearm. Open carry is unusual, but not incredibly rare. Conceal carry is fairly common.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] calabast@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

The only thing that will stop knife crime is more good people with knives!

/s

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Germany, cutting down on knife crime.

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Fucking idiot Faeser again. She's a walking faux pa, a walking traffic accident. She does so much shit every day, that just reading her name makes me puke a little. If her bullshit wouldn't have so big consequence one could just ignore this dumb cow. The day she gets kicked out of every political position I'll party.

And yes I'm aware of what I said is rude and I look like an idiot too, but she is one of the few except where I feel no holding back.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What else has she done? Like, greatest hits?

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“ye got a loicense for that carving knife?”

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ey, hasch du au a Lizens für des Messerle?

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Noi, aber n anerkannda Grund fürs mitnämma.
Mit a baar Fädra am Huat isch des Brauchtumspfläg oder so.*

* Aber i bin koin Rechtsverdreher.

Translation of Swabian-German dialect:

In my opinion I have a legal reason for carrying a knife if it fits my traditional attire. But IANAL. /s

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

Haja wenn's so isch will I di ned uffhalde

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›