this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
-33 points (24.6% liked)

Technology

59436 readers
3535 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If you thought dating apps tried their damnedest to make sure you don't find a human match, just wait until things like Replika really kick off.

You're gonna see these companies do everything they can to make a real relationship nigh impossible because their business model demands it.

Didn't anyone listen to Sex Education on Futurama!?

Don't. Date. Robots!

[–] filister@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

The whole working model of the dating apps goes the drain if they find you a really good match, right?

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I guess that would only happen you don't step out of your room and social. How counld they prevent one steping outside and say hello to anyone?

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Think about what has happened in the last 30 years to culture and human interaction levels in most industrialized societies. Think how hard it would have been to even imagine what life for a teenager looked like in 2025.

Now imagine 30 more years of this and what dating will look like.

[–] stellargmite@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hadn't thought of this. I wonder how they would tread what you'd think would be a thin line. Or are lonely people that credulous? On the other hand being provided your perfect match during the trial period and falling in love with this corporate entity which you are then made to pay for access to? Dystopian.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

People tell themselves sweet lies about the real people they love as it is.

And sometimes those people you've lied to yourself about reveal themselves as not really caring much for you.

As sad as it is, yes, I think a lot of lonely people would pay a premium to avoid having to search for that person who accepted them for their flaws, especially since this partner will not also demand any growth on the part of their human. Most partners also want personal growth and forward movement in life, while a "perfect partner" won't ask for anything in return but will always have new hot "skins" for a low price in their store. In fact, that's probably where the conniving shit would come in, because why promote healthy personal growth when you can promote addiction that makes you money?

Rejection and personal growth is hard, and this company is essentially selling a way out of that. (Not to imply those are the only reasons people pursue this, I just see a lot of people who would rather avoid any real responsibility to anyone else but still feel loved. I'm sure there's some broken, lonely people who really need something like this in a good way, in a non-exploitative way.)

[–] stellargmite@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeh a symptom of consumerism being (or pretending to be) the antidote to everything. A solution can always be purchased.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago

The future of AI is people waking up to the complete pile of hype we have been exposed to.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

marriage with chatbots

Subscription- based, I'm sure. We got a divorce because the $7.99 per month plan got jacked up to $12.99 and they started inserting ads!

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They're already charging $79/year for a subscription. No monthly membership.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 4 points 3 months ago

Aw man, the six-figure salary alpha dude bros are still going to be the only ones getting girls because they're the only ones who can afford multiple subscriptions.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

She can vibrate the dildo to a McDonald's jingle.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can't wait for the SaaS relationship model.

[–] Reawake9179@lemmy.kde.social 4 points 3 months ago

Onlyfans chatbots are already running for a good year

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 7 points 3 months ago

Couples going through a rough patch can open-source their marriage.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wow chatbot seller says chatbots are the future of everything? I'm shocked.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

And 🥑 avocados. Avocados are the future.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 3 months ago

Yes... I need to pay this clown a subscription!!!

These people got mental problems or maybe we do if we pay her.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Can't sue because the chat bot Cassandra is your wife. Sorry, Cassandra runs on our server.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What's wrong with her? I mean, she doesn't loook like she needs to marry a robot... :)

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 3 months ago

She doesn't... Losers need it tho ;)