this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
166 points (99.4% liked)

Anti-Corporate Movement

409 readers
1 users here now

This community is the first one on lemmy of its kind. It sits between the idea of anarchism/anti-capitalism and left leaning economic policy.

Our goal is to make people aware of the dangers of corporate control, its influence on governments and people as well as the small but steady abrasion of empathy around the world indirectly caused by it.

Current topics this includes but is not limited to:

Feel free to debate this but beware, corporate rhetoric is not welcome here. If you have arguments, bring them on. If its rhetoric trying to defend the evil actions of corporations, we will know and you will go.

Our declared goal so far is to have all companies and individuals worldwide capped at 999 mil USD in all assets, including ownership of other companies, sister companies and marital assets. The reason for this is that companies (and individuals) are not supposed to resemble small(?) countries with a single leader(-board) and shareholder primacy. Thats why we feel like they must be kept in check indefinitely.

But companies will just wander off The argument that large companies will just wander off is valid, which we embrace. We dont need microsoft, apple, google, amazon and other trillion dollar companies. There are small competitors being kept small and driven into brankruptcy by anti competitive behavior of these giants or simply bought up and closed. If starbucks left tomorrow, we would not have an issue with this.

But then we have x little microsofts that all belong to the same person(s) If in fact nobody was allowed to accumulate more than 999 mil in assets, they would not be able to own all these. And like defending agains burglary, it is not about complete defence but time and effort. You only have to keep the thief occupied long enough for them to be caught, give up or make a mistake.

But these giants have tons of IP which would then limit our growth Thats another topic we must touch on. We will (only this one time) take a page out of russias playbook and demand that IP of non complying companies (assets over 999 mil USD) will be declared invalid, which opens them up to be copied.

But then they will "live" in one country that doesnt accept this Correct, and they should be taken into custody the moment they enter the airspace of a country that supports this act.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 months ago (6 children)
[–] crazyminner@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can't have people having free time to do things that might undermine their power.

What if they now how free time to create services that support eachother outside of capitalism?? Can't have that happening. They need us exhausted and wasting our time.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 8 points 2 months ago

I think thats pretty spot on.

[–] shani66@ani.social 15 points 2 months ago

Cruelty is just as important to the capitalist as money. Brash stupidity is also a major theme among the rich.

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 14 points 2 months ago

"Wow, a 4-day workweek has yielded amazing productivity numbers, imagine if we did a 5-day workweek!"

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Looks like it was an experiment so they had a planned start/stop date. They probably want to get some more data and go through legal before fully enacting it.

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Plus, they're dealing with Japan which had a hugely different work culture to most of the world.

These poor mfers were probably just stoked to have the insulin pendulum swing a bit - no idea how well it transpires in counties with normal conditions

(Full disclosure, I'll a kiwi, so we work hard but have basic protections, etc. No idea what it would do in America or Europe - probably still awesome, but I doubt it would pay for itself so clearly as the insane Japanese convention)

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Because it would encourage worker's rights and communism, duh.

/s

[–] other_cat@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if we'll see this happen in the next 20 years...

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 8 points 2 months ago

If we stay uncomfortable, we could. As long as we vote, speak up and act we can assume that things will move in the right direction.