this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
136 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

34816 readers
319 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 40 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"Could it be that we pay the top brass too much? Nonono, that's not it. Cut workers that depend on us to survive."

[–] AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago

-The Top Brass

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Think of the poor shareholders!

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Aren't they recalling two complete SERIES of CPUs?

Guess those execs really need their bonuses

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't think they announced any such recall?

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

so they should have some spare money to send me a new CPU to replace my fucked raptor lake CPU.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They should be thinking of the loss involved in replacing these CPUs as an investment in Intel's long-term reputation. But instead they're thinking "how can we make the line go up this quarter?" and cutting staff. It's shortsighted, as all public companies are these days.

[–] WbrJr@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It feels like its always the same with big companies trying to please their stakeholders. They just manoeuvered themselves into a very bad corner by planning super short term and trying to milk each product to their limits. All of this because they were super dominant for a long time. But as soon as they experience pressure by amd, apple m1 series or qualcom, to actually perform, they crumble under their own short term planning. It feels like their existence ist onley based on their reputation from several years back and the lack of research done by the customers

[–] bachatero@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

big companies trying to please their stakeholders

I don't think that happened here, with the stock dropping off 27% with one of the worst days since Y2K.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Hahahaha! Oh my this is hilariously sad!

So they took ~~-government-~~ taxpayers' money to create jobs. But instead spent it on stock buybacks. And now they are lying off thousands of workers because they need money?

We all knew the CHIPS Act was a scam, but I didn't expect it to be obvious this fast. I thought they would be more tacit about it.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

STOP FLOODING THE MARKET ASSHOLES