"...the Soviet Union that the United States and other Western nations should partner with Russia to keep the country's aerospace workers employed and prevent "rogue states" like Iran or North Korea from hiring them."

Actually makes some sense

Anyways the RD180s are actually really reliable boosters. The Russians did make good rockets in they heyday

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

What a weird article, ULA is just as commercial as SpaceX, and they've been launching all sorts of military payloads.

Now, I get that the US government would rather not be dependent on a billionaire who is on very friendly terms with their geopolitical opponents. But that doesn't mean SpaceX doesn't exist.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

SpaceX doesn't use Russian engines, though. That's what this article is referring to, now all US rockets are free from Russian parts.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

now all US rockets are free from Russian parts

Technically this isn't true. The US military no longer has any unfulfilled launch contracts that will use Russian engines, but the ULA still has some RD-180s that they will almost certainly use for future commercial launches. Today simply marks the end of the RD-180 as a means of launching military payloads.

[–] Ydna@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

You're absolutely correct - I toured the ULA Decatur booster faculty mere days ago. There's spaceforce-branded parts bolted onto Centaur rockets using Russian engines all over the place. Now to be fair they also have an engine made in Washington too but this stuff takes a looooong time to make any changes.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

United Launch Alliance, which became the sole contractor certified to carry large US military satellites to orbit until SpaceX started launching national security missions in 2018.