this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
173 points (99.4% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

8737 readers
1 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have my respect for GrapheneOS for addressing the Play Integrity API issue.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] user@lemmy.one 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Shit. All google needs to do is F GOS and game over for pixel phones and GOS. GOS really needs a backup manufacturer that maybe can achieve GOS goals.

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I always found it weird that the OS that attempts to limit the impact of Google's severe privacy issues mostly only runs on hardware by Google.

As soon as Google wants to, you kind of just lose.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I always found it weird that the OS that attempts to limit the impact of Google’s severe privacy issues mostly only runs on hardware by Google.

Not only weird, but it's beyond rich. There's no way on God's green Earth I'm giving money to Google to buy hardware that allows me to escape Google's corporate surveillance machine. That's just too much irony for me.

My deGoogled cellphone therefore is a FairPhone running CalyxOS.

CalyxOS is a mighty fine AOSP distribution, in case you wonder. Very pro, very polished, and I've never had a problem with it.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Pixels (and the Nexus before them) are very hackable compared to most other phones. They're a good platform for this sort of thing, and why not use it? If you have alternatives, get portin'.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago

Their modems are crap. The primary function of a phone is to access cellular signal. No thanks.

[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)
[–] archchan@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mastodon for those who avoid Twitter entirely

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 3 months ago

This isn't the same post?

[–] thatsnomayo@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

we need a bot for this now that we have healthy instances again

[–] Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago

Oh shit I thought nitter was dead

[–] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

When your backend is google, you give google your backend.

https://postmarketos.org/

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

How is it for receiving calls from idle?

I really want Linux Mobile to work but last time I looked the receiving calls from idle was unreliable and it's the most important part of a mobile phone.

This was on the OG Pinephone.

[–] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

By idle I assume you mean while the phone is suspended? It works fine for me (verizon US, phosh) though there's an extremely rare bug where the phone will fail to resume from suspend and needs to be rebooted. Also I find I need to restart modemmanager after I boot or the modem doesn't come online, though that may just be a problem specific to me since I think I installed the open source firmware for the pinephone modem incorrectly since there's a bunch of other stuff that doesn't work properly (hangs on a lot of AT commands).

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. Which distro are you using?

[–] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago

PostmarketOS

[–] Genghis@monero.town 1 points 3 months ago

This does not solve the Play Integrity API issue. This would make app compatibility even worse lol.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That's a great one liner!

[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Well. I was literally considering getting a pixel fold in the next few days to give grapheneOS a try. I guess I won't now? What other good options are there for a (mostly) casual who wanted minimal fiddling and maximum privacy? Just switching back to iPhone?

[–] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I doubt iPhone is better, and it's marketing instead. Or it's a matter of time before they wanna go the data mining road. You can also get a fairphone and install a custom ROM

[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Right, but not Graphene, though, right? The whole draw of Graphene is that it's relatively easy and android-feature complete, no?

[–] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No idea tbh. I edited my message to fix my mistake too

[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, apple is always teetering on that fence where on the one side, they're a Corpo and want to sell your data, but on the other side their whole draw and the logic behind being a walled garden is the privacy aspect for their users. If they drop the privacy draw, then why would some users want to stay in a walled garden

[–] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Familiarity

[–] Genghis@monero.town 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Only a few apps enforce Play Integrity so it is still the best option for a casual user. Cash App enforcing it is my biggest hurdle.

[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Is there a master list of apps that do this, I wonder?

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's nothing wrong with Graphene. I've been using it for months now on my Pixel 7.

[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Did you read the post...? It seems like Google is starting to fuck with app access, unless I'm misunderstanding?

[–] Persen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

They didn't change anything. Banking apps rely on play integrity to check if the device is secure (not bootloader unlocked/rooted). Google abuses this, so grapheneos devices also don't get the support.

[–] MasterBuilder@lemmy.one 1 points 2 months ago

I'm confused. Authy is just a 2FA client. There's half a dozen in fdroid. I use FreeOTC myself. Are graphene users unable to use anything else?