this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
641 points (98.1% liked)

Memes

8321 readers
1313 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 101 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Horses today yes. They are built incredibly efficient compared to yesterday's horses. Better ligament material, lighter and stronger bones, not to mention the carbon muscle fibers.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 54 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This but unironically, horses are constantly being bred to be bigger. The reason people rode chariots in Greece is because horses were too small to ride horseback.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah one of the main causes of the downfall of chariot warfare in the ancient world was that horses were bred that could carry a fully armed rider with armour for a long enough period of time.

Disclaimer: I know very little about anything.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I'm not so sure. There's plenty of accounts of ancient warriors using ridden horses as transportation. It probably has more to do with a chariot being more compatible with horse/soldier training and soldier gear at the time. Riding a horse into battle takes a lot of unique training and gear, and camels were the better option for a lot of the latitude around North Africa/Middle East, where you had ancient empires with the ability to research technology.

The idea that horses had to embiggen, I think, comes from the Persians. They wanted the world's first heavy cavalry and they certainly needed bigger horses for a fully armored rider. But light cavalry has evidence dating back to at least 5,000 B.C. thanks to the proto mongols. (Central Asian tribes before they were united)

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 months ago

Of you feed a house kerosene it will run much faster but it will emit white smoke.

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don’t forget about the gear all horses are on nowadays! You need to check the labels for All Natural hp.

[–] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Say, I'm not really a horse guy, but my dad says my mustang needs more blinker fluid. Well the guy at the stable sold me some, but now where do I put it?

[–] Damage@feddit.it 7 points 4 months ago

I mean, it's the eyes that blink...

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

On the right and left nacelles.

Horses today yes. They are built incredibly efficient compared to yesterday’s horses. Better ligament material, lighter and stronger bones, not to mention the carbon muscle fibers.

and i thought horses used to be toeing the line between fucking exploding and run fast hee hee hoo hoo

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago

So what do you want?

Faster horses?

[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

I was curious, so read up on wikipedia.

somebody measured horses in 2023, and foumd that horses produce 5,7hp https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsepower

edit: wikipedia links to youtube

https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/how-much-horsepower-does-a-horse-have this one also says 15, teorietically 24 🤯

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 69 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Citing measurements made at the 1926 Iowa State Fair, they reported that the peak power over a few seconds has been measured to be as high as 14.88 hp (11.10 kW) and also observed that for sustained activity, a work rate of about 1 hp (0.75 kW) per horse is consistent with agricultural advice from both the 19th and 20th centuries [...]

Sounds to me like the 1 hp unit is fair, after all.

[–] kshade@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

So it's like RMS and PMP for speakers. 600 W¹

¹ Briefly, before it blows up

[–] uis@lemm.ee -3 points 4 months ago
[–] pacology@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Here is the salient point on the Wikipedia page that explains why horses don’t produce 1 HP:

Watt judged that the horse could pull with a force of 180 pounds-force (800 N)

Basically, Watts made up HP to sell his steam engine to mines and likely made up a number to make the new technology seem better.

Some things never change.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Gotta love autocorrection of Watt into Watts. Watt = J/s = N*m/s = kg*m*m/(s^2*s) = kg*m^2/(s^3)

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 58 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Sure that sounds like a lot, until you realize even a small firearm can deal 9 damage per second, suddenly 15 hp isn't all that much

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 28 points 4 months ago

I'm still not over learning that ponies aren't just young horses.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago

That's only hitscan. Projectiles like rockets can deal 90 HP damage.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

thats not a sustainable amount of horsepower for a horse, but it is for an engine. Notably engines are better at moving heavy loads for longer and uphill. The name is misleading though. It should be like "sustained horsepower"

[–] uis@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wikipedia: "Two common definitions used today are the imperial horsepower, which is about 745.7 watts, and the metric horsepower, which is approximately 735.5 watts."

Oh fuck!

The name is misleading though, it should be like "non-systemic unit of power" or "non-SI unit of power".

[–] Omega_Man@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

While it does sound cool to say my car has 490 NSU, I think horsepower is still cooler. Horses are cool.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Watt is better unit of power.

[–] Omega_Man@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Watt are you even talking about?

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I was told 1 hp was the output of 1 donkey, so horse power is actually donkey power.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] BambiDiego@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Mmm, love me some DP, especially from my blower.

It's gas powered.

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 4 points 4 months ago

A DP with a two stroke? Damn

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

What did you pay for that DP from a gas powered blower? Just curious...

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] tea@lemmy.today 4 points 4 months ago

Especially those who own horses (because they have money)

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

Well this is deeply misleading isn’t it

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

1 HP is the average work over a day.

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I wouldn't be surprised to discover horses are better cared for now than when the coin was termed. We just understand nutrition better these days for both humans and animals. And we don't beat our animals like they did back then either.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Some people definitely still beat the shit out of their horses and livestock. Just go to a rodeo in the US sometime and you will see it.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

OTOH, a horse was incredibly valuable to a common man.

[–] CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

There's evidence that knights would dismount before battle to prevent their horse from being injured, even though they knew they were exposing themselves to greater risk. Although we have more technical knowledge about how to "optimally" care for horses now, there's no reason to believe that we aren't as or more exploitative of them, rendering them as or less healthy than horses back then.