this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
94 points (98.0% liked)

Women

823 readers
15 users here now

A place for discussion, camaraderie, and advice.

For, from, and with women. Hi πŸ‘‹

RULES:

--Be good to one another.

If you're not sure about what you're about to type, ask yourself: Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary?

--About, but not only for, women.

We are here to talk about, learn about, and wonder about women and their/our experiences. Men are allowed to post here, but only for the purpose of asking sincere questions about women or for advice related to a women in their lives they are trying to support.

--No bullies. No Creeps. No trolls.

No personal attacks, no misogyny, no misandry, ageism, racism, or otherwise hateful or disrespectful commentary.

--No selling products or services.

You can recommend products/methods that work for you, but soliciting clients or patients is not allowed. No advertising or self-promotions, including using this sub to drive traffic elsewhere.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IAmLamp@fedia.io 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The concept of this quantity even being known is saddening and disturbing. This should be private information and not even shared through abstraction. The slippery slope of potential ex post facto revenge (and let’s not fool ourselves, revenge is the proper term for what might happen if this data is ever acted upon) is very real. And for anyone on the right who thinks this is overreaction, remember that you have expressed the same concerns regarding registries of your 2A rights. And both arguments are valid. There should not be tracking on politically sensitive topics like this. This divisive culture of politics is corroding our country.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I know where you're heading, but the comparison with the 2A upsets me. Owning a weapon is something that should be way harder than getting pregnant by accident (or having an unviable fetus or whatever).

I don't know, I'm pissed. As long as I'm not a danger or nuisance to anybody just leave me the duck alone and if I decide I need an abortion then be it. I'm a guy, so that might never happen but who cares. A fucking gun is not a part of human biology.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My homie, not all rights are there because they're part of the body.

The right to defense, which is core to the right to bear arms, is no more or less valid than the right of free speech, the right to due process, etc.

I agree that the right to body autonomy is of paramount importance. I would even argue that it's the single most important right a human can have.

This does not invalidate the right to defense, or the extension of that which is necessary so long as any guns exist. If every gun on the planet turned into manure, and every mind was wiped of how to make them, I'd be perfectly happy. But as long as they exist, the right of anyone to defend themselves, their loved ones, their nation/region/culture requires access to them.

We go back to bows and arrows, spears, swords, and do away with anything like a gun, that's great. Just be aware that there will always be some kind of object that is the top choice for a weapon. Even if that choice is limited to rocks and sticks with no changes to them, then access to them is mandatory for the right to defense.

You want to ban guns? Great. Start with the militaries of the world. Then the police. After that's done, I'm open to negotiations regarding personal ownership and usage.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My homie, bodily autonomy beats tiny dick replacement therapy in the form of weaponry any time. No matter how real the threat might be, which is in most cases imaginary.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh, so you're just looking for an excuse to be a douche. Have fun with that.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 months ago

If that's your definition then yes. Very much.

[–] AquaTofana@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I am pretty sure that anyone who is advocating to not vote Biden because of his support of Israel is either:

A - A GOP troll and shouldn't be trusted in general B - Someone who feels like they're protected because they currently live in a blue state and so a lack of access will never affect them/their loved ones.

I'm a lady in Texas (not birthing age anymore @ 35 bitchessssss!) but shit is not good here for women who are birthing age/able to carry a child.

If Trump (or any Republican) is elected, the blue states won't be safe anymore either. The people suffering will be YOUR sisters, wives, mothers, cousins, aunts, etc. There won't be crossing state lines for care, even if you could technically "afford it".

Focus on protecting half the country first. Prioritize your shit. No one is going to be a 100% perfect candidate.

And before anyone comes for me, yes, I fucking hate Netanyahu and think he needs to be stopped. However, I'm also focusing on myself (and other women in America) first. Downvote me if you want, but I don't want the abortion ban to be felt anywhere else than it has been already!

Edit: Grammar

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Next step for republicans: permanent checkpoints at red state borders. "Are your papers in order? What's in the trunk? What's in the suitcase?..."

Next step for the mentally-lazy, smug bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL aMiRiTe types: passively let it happen, fondle their purity, distractedly yet lovingly sniff their fingers, early and often.