this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
79 points (90.7% liked)

nonononoyes

4667 readers
1 users here now

A sub for things that seem to go so brilliantly wrong, but oh so right.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Makes me wonder why there is no barrier installed to block the path when a train is coming. That sort of thing is all over the place in countries with robust rail travel. It seems like a well-defined crossing so it'd be a no-brainer to install one there.

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 15 points 4 months ago

A) It's a tram

And

B) No there isn't, they share the roads with everyone else

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think it's just a street. So it'd be like installing a barrier on the pavement.

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's true, this appears to be a light rail crossing. But then again that's a pretty large station for just light rail so I'm not sure.

Where I live there are generally no gates for light rail but there are for all pedestrian crossings over ordinary train tracks, which honestly just makes me think we probably should be installing more safety measures for light rail.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Part of the reason why Boston transitioned from streetcars to the subway is how many people died each year after being hit by them. There is definitely no reason in the modern day why rail needs to share space with pedestrian traffic, and protections should be in place in any area where they intersect.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

trams at street level are convenient though

also costs much less than grade separating everything

[–] Dagrothus@reddthat.com 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Were y l8 4 t tram n 2 busy 2 tipe "with"?

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Don't wear headphones while crossing roads, bike lanes, or train tracks. :P

[–] BatrickPateman@feddit.de 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Or at least stop and look around before crossing.

[–] britishblaze@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah that's my main takeaway, you should also not be listening at a volume that makes you unable to hear a car horn or a bicycle bell.

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Honestly I don't know why people wear headphones at all outside. I mean, I get we should all be able to hear our tunes or podcasts or whatever, but unawareness of your surroundings can change your life for the worse very quickly.

I seem to recall an ad for some product in the last couple years that still lets you hear what's around you with clarity while listening, though I can't seem to find it now.

Edit: Maybe these? https://www.cnn.com/cnn-underscored/electronics/sony-linkbuds-earbuds-hear-your-surroundings

The reviews are iffy on them though. idk, I just don't want noise cancellation until I'm someplace I'm going to be sitting in a long time that has sounds I don't want to hear.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Bone conduction headphones solve this problem.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

Can't help but think of all the people inside the train