this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2022
19 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy

12535 readers
2 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It feels like upvotes don't have enough weight in the algorithm, as the order is almost always newest-comments-first

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PP44@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think it is voluntarily weighted more heavily towards time than upvote compared to other sites like reddit. The reasoning being (I think) that it allow more diversity and less "snowballing" where the most active user just arrive first, get the upvotes, and stays on top. Effectively killing the possibility of a late very pertinent comment to ever climb up.

I think this is a very difficult equilibrium to find, and it has serious implication on how discussions are built. But I really think Reddit has the opposite problem. Come to a post a few hours/days late, and you will never be heard. I create FOMO and pushes user to come back often. This is to me a business model for sure, but not the best way to organize online asynchronous discussions.

[–] hamborgr@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago

You're right. There's even a section in the Docs dedicated to this topic.

[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Probably same as reddits. But idk.

[–] Icarus@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

if you don't know, you don't need to comment, just saying...

[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

no-impulsiveness gang is strong