This a problem of sites being incentivised to get clicks rather than providing accurate and useful data, so every study gets an article with a click-bait title. Studies show all kinds of things, and unfortunately they get lots of publicity from sites that sensationalize the findings even if the study paper do a sober analysis of their findings.

Here's a decent study if anyone's interested: https://munin.uit.no/handle/10037/20825

[–] fu@libranet.de 1 points 2 years ago

@nour @Deer_Tito Hey this is a memes page, don’t go bringing facts into it.

[–] holdengreen@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Had like 9 ounce today. thought maybe it's not actually unhealthy....

[–] Shrimpy@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wtf?

[–] nour@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Tabloid headlines, can't choose one coherent narrative LMAO

(For clarification, I posted it because I found the contradiction amusing, not because I believe the headlines. This is the memes community, after all.)

[–] 10_0@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Must be a conspiracy to not use the same sources while researching about coffee

[–] ree@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Cup of coffee as a measurement is meaningless anyway.

An expresso at the coffee place near my home is at 16g of coffee while an expresso out of the coffee machine at my work is 7g.

Moreover extraction will vary according to the method used and caffeine is variable across cofee species.