this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
161 points (95.5% liked)

Apple

17435 readers
169 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 78 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is it a third-party app store if Apple decides what it's allowed to offer?

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 56 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The EU will absolutely take issue with this. What they’ve done is beyond the scope of the law … again.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

a piece of paper doesn't matter if theres no enforcement.

from the law enforcement or the implementation itself.

[–] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Its against the law after the first time

[–] land@lemmy.ml 43 points 4 months ago (18 children)

Apple and it’s policies can feck off

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

#1 reason I stick with PCs. Apple deciding that it knows best and deciding how users get to use their machines thanks to the Apple walled garden.

Windows would like to catch up, but thankfully you’re still free to completely break it if you want.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Eggyhead@kbin.run 23 points 4 months ago

However, as it stands, UTM is not proceeding to contest the ruling. As apps distributed on iOS cannot use a JIT compiler (other than specially entitled alternative browser engines), the functionality and performance of the emulators running through UTM SE, the version submitted for review that had JIT disabled, was significantly impaired. UTM says getting UTM SE approved “isn’t worth fighting for”.

Oh. Well okay then.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 19 points 4 months ago

I don't think EU will like the part about third-party stores.

[–] countablenewt@allthingstech.social 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@neme I like how the devs were like “eh, it’s not even that good of an app, whatever”

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah well because Apple doesn't allow JIT compilation, so the performance would've sucked anyway.

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’d guess Windows for Arm would perform fine though.

[–] B0rax@feddit.de 8 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Not really… I have tried it before on an m1 iPad. It is not usable for any windows version. XP for example takes over 15 minutes just to boot. It takes multiple seconds for clicks to register, etc.

Linux, like Debian for example, will be much more usable, but still far from anything you would call a smooth experience.

Again, not having JIT really kills the performance here.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›