this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
103 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
205 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived link

Wildly popular social network TikTok approved adverts containing political disinformation ahead of European polls, a report showed Tuesday (4 June), flouting its own guidelines and raising questions about its ability to detect election falsehoods.

"TikTok has failed miserably in this test,” said Henry Peck, a senior campaigner at Global Witness, the organization that cobducted the study.

The fake ads, submitted by the group last month, all contained content that could pose a risk to electoral processes — including warnings to voters to stay home over a danger of poll violence and a spike in contagious diseases.

They also included a fake notice raising the legal voting age to 21 and appeals for people to vote by email, which is not permitted in European elections.

Citing an internal investigation, the Chinese ByteDance-owned app said its systems correctly identified the breach, but the ads were approved due to “human error” by a moderator.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rekhyt@beehaw.org 42 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Citing an internal investigation, the Chinese ByteDance-owned app said its systems correctly identified the breach, but the ads were approved due to “human error” by a moderator.

This makes it so much worse. If it were "our algorithms didn't catch it" that'd be one thing, but "our algorithms caught it but we ran them anyway" reeks of malice.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 8 points 5 months ago

Reads to me like "oh no, our automated verification is perfect, there was just one rogue human who has been punished/corrected/re-educated so there's no way this could ever happen again, case closed"

[–] Melkath@kbin.social 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Get Murdock news outlet malice. Go.

Get Facebook malice. Go.

Get Twitter malice. Go.

Get Reddit malice. Go.

Get Google malice. Go.

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"But what about" * 5. It's always whataboutism with sycophants of autocratic regimes.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Only one company is being banned by an autocratic regime though.

[–] Melkath@kbin.social 21 points 5 months ago

Cool.

Do it with Murdoch owned news outlets.

[–] authorinthedark@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

rare W on the misinformation front for YouTube and Twitter, obviously not all platform misinformation is in ads but I'll take what i can get