this post was submitted on 28 May 2024

21 points (88.9% liked)

Linux

47948 readers

1696 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

A screen recorder in the Browser? (self.linux)

submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by boredsquirrel to c/linux@lemmy.ml

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I wondered, Browsers work really well, are already there anyways, have all the GPU stuff etc already dealt with. They also have portal support so Wayland works great.

It could use the Browsers screencast ability on all platforms, and run with Javascript and WASM.

The stuff could be installed in a local Podman container and thus also work natively on Linux.

Do you know an app that does this, client-side?

Thanks to the actually helpful people:

screenity, GPLv3, has some nice features

recordscreen.io some random webservice, the recording is supposedly done in the browser. Proprietary.

all 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[+] helenslunch@feddit.nl 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[+] boredsquirrel -11 points 5 months ago (4 children)

OBS is extremely bloated for simple screen recording.

There is GPU Screen recorder which I currently use, and it is fine. But that is pretty much the only one.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

OBS is extremely bloated for simple screen recording.

And a browser isn't??

[+] boredsquirrel -6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean I already use a browser all the time.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I guess the word "bloat" has no meaning anymore.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

"bloat" = it has features I don't like

[+] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml -10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Highly disagree. Even though bloat may not matter much on your $10000 PC, it still gets worse over time and creates more and more ewaste for no reason.

EDIT: yep there are a lot of laziness and bloat supporters in this community for sure

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I've ran OBS on a 5 year old Chromebook with 32GB storage using Linux to stream to Twitch, I think most computers are capable of running OBS to record a video.

[+] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml -13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm not talking about OBS. I'm talking about the "bloat doesn't matter. Just buy a new PC" philosophy

[–] abcxyz@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Noone in this chain implied that

[+] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml -8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes because atzanteol said it directly

[–] leopold@lemmy.kde.social 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The idea that a web application for screen recording is less bloat than OBS is absurd. As this was the idea presented by OP, atzanteol reacted by figuratively saying that the word no longer had any meaning. Given the context, this was quite clearly not an attempt to downplay the effects or severity of software bloat, but simply a figurative use of the phrase meant to point out how badly the word bloat had been misused. You completely misinterpreted their comment. Then, when this was pointed out to you, you proceeded to do the Reddit thing of mockingly editing your original downvoted comment, successfully making an ass out of yourself.

[–] boredsquirrel 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I didnt understand that statement though.

A browser is simply the bottom line. Its the stuff I always open up. It is always in RAM.

Firefox has more stable screencast capabilities than many recorders.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Feature creep is a hallmark of "software bloat". Using a web browser to do something completely unrelated to it's core functionality is pretty much the definition of "bloat".

Obs is purpose-built to do the thing you want to do. That it also has features you don't want does not make it "bloated".

[–] boredsquirrel 1 points 5 months ago

Fair points. A video recorder for me doesnt need internet access while a browser obviously has it. A browser needs that for me as I use it for video calls, even though it is a bit strange to do this.

But thats it, browsers are multimedia platforms today and using another tool additionally to that doesnt change anything.

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry but I did not and still do not see that atzanteol's comment was about web screen recorders. It can be my English or it can be your desire to "be like the crowd" and fight me. Idk

[–] abcxyz@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Its your english

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

May be

[–] XEAL@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago

Features ≠ Bloat

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 7 points 5 months ago

Which dependency of OBS make you say that? Most of them are already probably installed on your system anyway.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

What do you mean by bloated? Isn't it 2 clicks at most after the one time next-next-finish setup?

[–] boredsquirrel 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Too many features, too cluttery UI, made for a complete task I may not use.

I used OBS a lot but would like to find something slimmer

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think you can disable most of the toolbars in the main screen if it helps.
You can do that in the "Docks" menu in the topmost bar, unticking any you don't need.
I think you can freely hide these, maybe more: stats, audio mixer, scene transitions, sources (after you have set up your capture source), scenes.

Then if it's still a lot, you can untick these in the View menu besides Docks: scene/source list buttons, source toolbar, status bar.

At that point you only have the controls dock, the preview, and the thin top bar.
Don't forget to reenable the sources dock and the audio mixer if you want to change those settings, though.

[–] boredsquirrel 1 points 5 months ago

I think I will switch back to OBS Studio or stay with GPU Screen recorder :D

But the idea is interesting anyways as a concept, as it works everywhere, on literally any Linux distro without any dependencies apart from "some" Javascript.

[–] moreeni@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You lost me on the part where we create an in-browser screen recorder... and then proceed to package it natively.

If you are just lookin for a light screen recording utility, I suggest giving Spectacle a try.

[–] SteveTech@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

Online screen recorders already exist too, I also don't think it really needs any server side logic either.

[–] boredsquirrel 1 points 5 months ago

Spectacle only runs on KDE afaik, which is not the problem. But it also doesnt really compress much, I dont know if it uses the GPU too.

Agree spectacle + ffmpeg might be a good solution with postprocessing.

[–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

You seem profoundly confused on what the hell you actually want

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

RecordScreen.io works for me when I want to do that. It's supposed to record locally (I've tried and have seen no data leaving my computer, but maybe should try taking it offline while recording, see if it breaks).

[–] boredsquirrel 2 points 5 months ago

Thanks for an actually useful comment :D

It might be something like Photopea, that can also just be downloaded and ran locally.

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

https://github.com/alyssaxuu/screenity

[–] boredsquirrel 2 points 5 months ago

Awesome!

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If you want a screen recorder, try Kooha. Not exactly sure what you want, exactly.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Service as a software substitute

[–] boredsquirrel 0 points 5 months ago

No, it is not a service if it runs locally in the browser.

And even less if you can load it from the system into the browser.

[–] omxxi@feddit.de -2 points 5 months ago

https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=online+screen+recorder