this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
77 points (96.4% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

33 readers
1 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TommySalami@lemm.ee 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does anyone else double-take when you see a Roger Ebert review pop up?

[–] SmokesForBreakfast@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. I find it not only distasteful but also misleading to some degree.

[–] 1bluepixel@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

Ebert had other reviewers on his website before he passed. The ones that are still running the site have high standards that, I think, carry on the legacy of Ebert's thoughtful, approachable movie criticism. I'm glad the website is still going in the age of review aggregators and social media hot takes.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep. I think the whole name of that thing (institution? I don't know what the deal is) is just dumb and awful. I've read plenty of the real Roger Ebert's reviews, and their value was his own personal style and perspective. A Rogereber.com without Roger makes no sense and I don't trust anyone that works there or tries to put their reviews forward under his name.

[–] inconceivabull@lemmy.film 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ebert clearly recognized the value of his brand, and did what he could to ensure it would continue to support his family and colleagues long after he was gone. And while you’re certainly within your rights to be critical of the new writers’ opinions, it’s not like some evil corporation brought them in after immediately assuming the legal rights to Roger’s name.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Oh I can see that and suspected it want some Evil corporation (for now I guess). I was just speaking as a user. I’m sure the whole makes sense from Roger’sc and his family’s perspective.

Thanks for the response!