this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
2058 points (93.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9682 readers
1772 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eggshappedegg@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Trains are great to connect cities. But a train trip for me will tipically take me will typically take 3 times longer than it would with a car. Last time I had to take the train/bus it took me 6 hours and had to change between 3 busses and 1 train. I could have done the whole trup in 2 hours, no changes and actually same price as I spent on fuel for my car.

And this is in Scandinavia where things run pretty smoothly!

I agree that within cities public transportation is great. But there are people who need cars no matter how many trains you set up or electrify. For us, EV is a good option (when they become more affordable)

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's because your country has a shitty rail network.

Before there were roads everywhere the car were not as practical.

[–] Crucible_Fodder@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago

the thing with trains is they get more inefficient the more tracks there are. Trains are great for connecting a few high spots with high traffic between them, not for everyone's daily transportation needs.

[–] eggshappedegg@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No.. I trains are great to comment A and B. But If you don't live in A or B, the they are not great.. The train network is fair where I live and covers a lot of the country. But still not everyone can use them. The majority of people living in cities can though. It will never cover the needs of all

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

In my country, 30 years ago, there was a train station every two villages.

French government built a crazy train network in the first half of the 20th century because it was the backbone of war logistics, and it allowed people to move. Cars and Europe made both these needs obsolete, so the rail network was abandoned.

You don't need to go more than 2km to find a train station in my country, it's just that most are abandoned now.

[–] Gecko@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This falls apart as soon as high-speed rail comes into play. I've done multiple train trips that outpace car trips primarily cause the train goes faster than the car.

[–] eggshappedegg@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly no matter how fast the trains go, I won't get home faster than when I use my car. You may, and many others may. The train I have to use connects two major cities. That connection is fair I need to change to several busses though to get from door A to B and that messes things up.

Trains are great if you live in the cities they go through but you can't gave trains go through all cities let alone villages

[–] Gecko@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ok hear me out, what about trains on streets (also known as trams :P)