Asklemmy

43777 readers

1338 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Has any scientific breakthrough come out of the Folding@Home project? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I probably donated 10 years of idle CPU time between 2005 to 2015.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hinterlufer@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The thing is that many of these things just can't be measured directly. You can use the information from the simulation to get a deeper understanding of e.g. some receptors (as was done), and use that information for something else. For example to optimize a binder for the receptor, or to manipulate the tonic signalling. But that's then often a paper building onto the findings from the simulation.

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah so that's the question, was any drug or other technique successfully optimized