Pleasant Politics

215 readers

66 users here now

Politics without the jerks.

This community is watched over by a ruthless robot moderator to keep out bad actors. I don't know if it will work. Read !santabot@slrpnk.net for a full explanation. The short version is don't be a net negative to the community and you can post here.

Rules

Post political news, your own opinions, or discussion. Anything goes.

All posts must follow the slrpnk sitewide rules.

No personal attacks, no bigotry, no spam. Those will get a manual temporary ban.

founded 4 months ago

MODERATORS

auk

santa

The power of being heard: The benefits of ‘perspective-giving’ (ombuds.columbia.edu)

submitted 4 months ago by Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/pleasantpolitics

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Abstract:

Although hundreds of dialogue programs geared towards conflict resolution are offered every year, there have been few scientific studies of their effectiveness.

Across 2 studies we examined the effect of controlled, dyadic interactions on attitudes towards the ‘other’ in members of groups involved in ideological conflict. Study 1 involved Mexican immigrants and White Americans in Arizona, and Study 2 involved Israelis and Palestinians in the Middle East. Cross-group dyads interacted via video and text in a brief, structured, face-to-face exchange: one person was assigned to write about the difficulties of life in their society (‘perspective-giving’), and the second person was assigned to accurately summarize the statement of the first person (‘perspective-taking’).

Positive changes in attitudes towards the outgroup were greater for Mexican immigrants and Palestinians after perspective-giving and for White Americans and Israelis after perspective-taking. For Palestinians, perspective-giving to an Israeli effectively changed attitudes towards Israelis, while a control condition in which they wrote an essay on the same topic without interacting had no effect on attitudes, illustrating the critical role of being heard.

Thus, the effects of dialogue for conflict resolution depend on an interaction between dialogue condition and participants' group membership, which may reflect power asymmetries.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] solo 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

[Edit: I say the following with some caution cause I read most of this study, but not all of it]

Of course dialogue can be a great tool for conflict resolution between two people with very different worldviews.

This study seems to me me to have a twisted approach tho. For example the problems between Mexican immigrants and white Americans, are not a result of lack of dialogue between themselves.

Their problems are the result of policies that have been present for such a long time and are made by other people higher up in government positions, implemented by law, police, armies etc. For me, failing to take these dynamics into consideration in a study like this can only provide misleading conclusions that exempt authorities from their responsibilities in creating and/or maintaining these dynamics.

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah I agree. There is a difference between understanding someone and actually caring enough to do something about it. For me what this study is useful for is helping us understand what helps change people's attitude towards each other on an individual level, I don't think that this can or should be applied in an institutional way at all because like you and the study mentions the power dynamics aren't level so wouldn't actually be that useful.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~