this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
225 points (94.5% liked)

Green Energy

2124 readers
49 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The head of the Australian energy market operator AEMO, Daniel Westerman, has rejected nuclear power as a way to replace Australia's ageing coal-fired power stations, arguing that it is too slow and too expensive. In addition, baseload power sources are not competitive in a grid dominated by wind and solar energy anyway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are historical accounts of volcanic activity blocking the sky, I think in Europe, for a few years. For all we know it was the whole planet. That would definitely disrupt solar energy collection without being an extinction level event.

Diversity is a genuine factor of fossil fuel free energy generation.

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Literally no sun for years would mean no crops which means everyone and all their animals would be dead

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yea, it would be pretty rough.

[–] revisable677@feddit.de 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] gazter@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ultimately good for the environment, though.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How do you determine what is good or bad for the environment?

The environment is just the result of many interactive factors. People need to reverse the perspective and ask is the environment good for us?

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

It was more of a lighthearted, fun joke about how I think that humans dying out works be a good thing for biodiversity, on balance.