this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
15 points (100.0% liked)
Pleasant Politics
215 readers
66 users here now
Politics without the jerks.
This community is watched over by a ruthless robot moderator to keep out bad actors. I don't know if it will work. Read !santabot@slrpnk.net for a full explanation. The short version is don't be a net negative to the community and you can post here.
Rules
Post political news, your own opinions, or discussion. Anything goes.
All posts must follow the slrpnk sitewide rules.
No personal attacks, no bigotry, no spam. Those will get a manual temporary ban.
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Both ultra-Orthodox Jweish parties are part of the current government. Shas has the Sephardic Haredi party is very much zionist nowadays. United Torah Judaism is not offically zionist, however they are also part of the current government, so yeah.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shas
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Torah_Judaism
Not too sure I understand what you are trying to say, could you please rephrase?
Also just to note, after seeing the following 2 min video from 13 years back I realized that anything even loosely related to Israel has been taken over by the Zionist propaganda machine, so unfortunately this part of wiki is not like the rest it, so I don't use or trust them as "neutral" references.
Course: Zionist Editing on Wikipedia - Israel National News - Arutz Sheva
Non Israel Jews will not be drafted anyway. So they do not matter. So the only ultra Orthodox Jews, which do matter, are the Israeli ones. So to get an idea of what they want, it is a good idea to look at what the parties are doing, which claim to represent them. Intresstingly both are part of the 2022 government of Netanyahu, which stopped any restricitions on settlements of Jews on the West Bank. They are also both part of the current united government.
Point being, that they are unfortunatly complicite in what is going on.
Now I understand your point, thanks for the clarifications.