this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
37 points (93.0% liked)

movies

1679 readers
476 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Shortly after A Quiet Place: Day One's record-breaking opening weekend, there was online outrage after it was reported that the horror movie would be available to watch at home within a month of its cinema release.

This was only an alleged release date and nothing has been confirmed by Paramount even now. It sparked a debate, however, about how the report would impact Day One's chances at the box office, and a wider one about how movies just aren't given the time to build their audiences at the cinema.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 15 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Going to the cinema is expensive and takes effort, so quick home releases will harm a movie's box office take but there's also an audience that, post-Covid, won't go to the cinema and I can see the temptation to milk that source if income too.

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 4 points 3 months ago

I would be among them and I know a few others as well. We'll rent or buy a movie at home, but we're not going to theaters anymore.

One problem, though, is that when movies are released for rent online at the same time that they are released in theaters, the charge might be something like $30. I could just wait a few months and buy it for cheaper.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

there's also an audience that, post-Covid, won't go to the cinema

I'm not quite in that camp, but I'm damn close. There just aren't a lot of movies coming out anymore that I am interested in enough to not want to wait, and where I feel that seeing it in the theater would add to the experience.

I'm privileged enough to have a damn good and big OLED screen at home, and the convenience of having complete control over my viewing experience can't be ignored.

For me, going to the theater is for when I get something significant from the experience that I can't get at home. That can be IMAX, 3D (on occasion), if the scale of the action is more immersive on a big screen, if it's a film where the audio mixing shines with a theater's atmos setup, or if it's the kind of thinking film that gets more out of full focus and immersion (but I can still get this last one at home after the family is in bed).

The big problem is that outside of movies from franchises and directors I already know, I don't usually know if it will hit any of those marks before I see it for the first time, and at that point it's out of the theater. I use an ad blocker everywhere I can, and even when I do catch trailers, I've been burned before by misleading marketing.

I hope that studios start looking more at the long tail than opening week statistics, and that more movies start coming back to theaters after their initial run. I love the various "#th anniversary screenings happening lately". I personally think that the opening week box office sales being the end all be all is an entirely outdated business practice that hasn't adapted to modern times, lives, and changes in the media consumption landscape over the last 20 years.

[–] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I don't go to the movies anymore and I typically wait until the movies are available to rent for cheap or are included in a streaming service.